Literature DB >> 22473601

Assessment of donor site morbidity for free radial forearm osteocutaneous flaps.

Catherine F Sinclair1, John P Gleysteen, Terence M Zimmermann, Mark K Wax, Babak Givi, Daniel Schneider, Eben L Rosenthal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Assessment of donor site morbidity and recipient site complications following free radial forearm osteocutaneous flap (FRFOCF) harvest and evaluation of patient perceived upper limb disability for free radial forearm osteocutaneous versus fasciocutaneous flaps (FRFF).
METHODS: First a case series was undertaken of 218 patients who underwent an FRFOCF at two tertiary referral centers between February 1998 and November 2010. Outcomes included forearm donor site morbidity and recipient site complications. Second, the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire assessing patient perceived arm disability was administered by phone to 60 consecutive patients who underwent an FRFOCF or FRFF.
RESULTS: Mean patient age was 63 years with male predominance (62.8%). Median bone length harvested was 8 cm (range, 3-12 cm) with prophylactic plating of the radius following harvest. Donor site morbidity included fracture (1 patient, 0.5%) and sensory neuropathy (5 patients, 2.3%). Mean DASH scores were comparative between groups and to established normative values. Mandibular malunion rate was 3.2% and hardware extrusion at the recipient site occurred in 15.6%.
CONCLUSION: Reluctance to perform FRFOCF by surgeons usually centers on concerns regarding potential donor site morbidity and adequacy of available bone stock; however, we identified minimal objective or patient perceived donor site morbidity or recipient site complications following harvest of FRFOCFs. Mild wrist weakness and stiffness are common but do not impede ability to perform activities of daily living. Data from this and other reports suggest this flap is particularly useful for midfacial and short segment mandibular reconstruction.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22473601      PMCID: PMC3951340          DOI: 10.1002/micr.21950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsurgery        ISSN: 0738-1085            Impact factor:   2.425


  19 in total

1.  The American academy of orthopaedic surgeons outcomes instruments: normative values from the general population.

Authors:  Frank G Hunsaker; Dominic A Cioffi; Peter C Amadio; James G Wright; Beth Caughlin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Oromandibular reconstruction with the radial-forearm osteocutaneous flap: experience with 60 consecutive cases.

Authors:  A Thoma; R Khadaroo; O Grigenas; S Archibald; S Jackson; J E Young; K Veltri
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Impact of impaired wrist motion on hand and upper-extremity performance(1).

Authors:  Brian D Adams; Nicole M Grosland; David M Murphy; Matthew McCullough
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.230

4.  Validity of the patient-focused wrist outcome instrument: do impairments represent functional ability?

Authors:  Andrea E Bialocerkowski; Karen A Grimmer; Gregory I Bain
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.907

5.  Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG)

Authors:  P L Hudak; P C Amadio; C Bombardier
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.214

6.  Functional outcomes of fibula and osteocutaneous forearm free flap reconstruction for segmental mandibular defects.

Authors:  Frank W Virgin; Tim A Iseli; Claire E Iseli; Jumin Sunde; William R Carroll; Jeffery S Magnuson; Eben L Rosenthal
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  The disablement process.

Authors:  L M Verbrugge; A M Jette
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  The forearm flap.

Authors:  R Song; Y Gao; Y Song; Y Yu; Y Song
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.017

9.  Staged reconstruction of the severely atrophic mandible with autogenous bone graft and endosteal implants.

Authors:  R Bryan Bell; George H Blakey; Raymond P White; Dennis G Hillebrand; Anthony Molina
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap: its use without significant donor site morbidity.

Authors:  A H Werle; T T Tsue; E B Toby; D A Girod
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.497

View more
  4 in total

1.  Reconstruction of dorsal hand and finger defects with reverse radial fasciocutaneous forearm flaps.

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Acar; Ali Güleç; Bahattin Kerem Aydin; Ömer Faruk Erkoçak; Mehmet Elmadag; Faik Türkmen
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-10-02

2.  The use of the radial styloid in the extended osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap.

Authors:  Jennifer Matthews; Wendy Ng; Stuart Archibald; Carolyn Levis
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 0.947

3.  Osteocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction: A focused evaluation of donor site morbidity and patient reported outcome measures in different reconstruction options.

Authors:  Marie Kearns; Panagiotis Ermogenous; Simon Myers; Ali Mahmoud Ghanem
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2018-11-15

4.  Case Report: Reconstruction of a Large Maxillary Defect With an Engineered, Vascularized, Prefabricated Bone Graft.

Authors:  Tarek Ismail; Alexander Haumer; Alexander Lunger; Rik Osinga; Alexandre Kaempfen; Franziska Saxer; Anke Wixmerten; Sylvie Miot; Florian Thieringer; Joerg Beinemann; Christoph Kunz; Claude Jaquiéry; Thomas Weikert; Felix Kaul; Arnaud Scherberich; Dirk J Schaefer; Ivan Martin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.