BACKGROUND: The gap between the supply of organs available for transplantation and demand is growing, especially among ethnic groups. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a video designed to address concerns of ethnic groups about organ donation. DESIGN: Cluster randomized, controlled trial. Randomization was performed by using a random-number table with centralized allocation concealment. Participants and investigators assessing outcomes were not blinded to group assignment. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00870506) SETTING: Twelve branches of the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles in northeastern Ohio. PARTICIPANTS: 952 participants aged 15 to 66 years. INTERVENTION: Video (intervention; n = 443) or usual Bureau of Motor Vehicles license practices (control; n = 509). MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who provided consent for organ donation on a newly acquired driver's license, learner's permit, or state identification card. Secondary outcomes included willingness to make a living kidney donation to a family member in need and personal beliefs about donation. RESULTS: More participants who viewed the video consented to donate organs than control participants (84% vs. 72%; difference, 12 percentage points [95% CI, 6 to 17 percentage points]). The video was effective among black participants (76% vs. 54%; difference, 22 percentage points [CI, 9 to 35 percentage points]) and white participants (88% vs. 77%; difference, 11 percentage points [CI, 5 to 15 percentage points]). At the end of the trial, fewer intervention than control participants reported having insufficient information about organ donation (34% vs. 44%; difference, -10 percentage points [CI, -16 to -4 percentage points]), wanting to be buried with all of their organs (14% vs. 25%; difference, -11 percentage points [CI, -16 to -6 percentage points]), and having conflicts with organ donation (7% vs. 11%; difference, -4 percentage points [CI, -8 to -2 percentage points]). LIMITATION: How the observed increases in consent to donate organs might translate into a greater organ supply in the region is unclear. CONCLUSION: Exposure to a brief video addressing concerns that ethnic groups have about organ donation just before obtaining a license, permit, or identification card increased consent to donate organs among white and black participants. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The gap between the supply of organs available for transplantation and demand is growing, especially among ethnic groups. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a video designed to address concerns of ethnic groups about organ donation. DESIGN: Cluster randomized, controlled trial. Randomization was performed by using a random-number table with centralized allocation concealment. Participants and investigators assessing outcomes were not blinded to group assignment. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00870506) SETTING: Twelve branches of the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles in northeastern Ohio. PARTICIPANTS: 952 participants aged 15 to 66 years. INTERVENTION: Video (intervention; n = 443) or usual Bureau of Motor Vehicles license practices (control; n = 509). MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who provided consent for organ donation on a newly acquired driver's license, learner's permit, or state identification card. Secondary outcomes included willingness to make a living kidney donation to a family member in need and personal beliefs about donation. RESULTS: More participants who viewed the video consented to donate organs than control participants (84% vs. 72%; difference, 12 percentage points [95% CI, 6 to 17 percentage points]). The video was effective among black participants (76% vs. 54%; difference, 22 percentage points [CI, 9 to 35 percentage points]) and white participants (88% vs. 77%; difference, 11 percentage points [CI, 5 to 15 percentage points]). At the end of the trial, fewer intervention than control participants reported having insufficient information about organ donation (34% vs. 44%; difference, -10 percentage points [CI, -16 to -4 percentage points]), wanting to be buried with all of their organs (14% vs. 25%; difference, -11 percentage points [CI, -16 to -6 percentage points]), and having conflicts with organ donation (7% vs. 11%; difference, -4 percentage points [CI, -8 to -2 percentage points]). LIMITATION: How the observed increases in consent to donate organs might translate into a greater organ supply in the region is unclear. CONCLUSION: Exposure to a brief video addressing concerns that ethnic groups have about organ donation just before obtaining a license, permit, or identification card increased consent to donate organs among white and black participants. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Authors: Michael T Quinn; G Caleb Alexander; Diane Hollingsworth; Kate Grubbs O'Connor; David Meltzer Journal: Prog Transplant Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 1.065
Authors: J Daryl Thornton; Catherine Sullivan; Jeffrey M Albert; Maria Cedeño; Bridget Patrick; Julie Pencak; Kristine A Wong; Margaret D Allen; Linda Kimble; Heather Mekesa; Gordon Bowen; Ashwini R Sehgal Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Lianne Barnieh; David Collister; Braden Manns; Ngan N Lam; Soroush Shojai; Diane Lorenzetti; John S Gill; Scott Klarenbach Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: J Daryl Thornton; Bridget Patrick; Catherine Sullivan; Jeffrey M Albert; Kristine A Wong; Margaret D Allen; Linda Kimble; Heather Mekesa; Gordon Bowen; Ashwini R Sehgal Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2019-03-13 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Derek A DuBay; Nataliya V Ivankova; Ivan Herbey; David T Redden; Cheryl Holt; Laura Siminoff; Mona N Fouad; Zemin Su; Thomas A Morinelli; Michelle Y Martin Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2018-09-23 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: N K R Sehgal; C Scallan; C Sullivan; M Cedeño; J Pencak; J Kirkland; K Scott; J D Thornton Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2016-01-22 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: J D Schold; E L G Heaphy; L D Buccini; E D Poggio; T R Srinivas; D A Goldfarb; S M Flechner; J R Rodrigue; J D Thornton; A R Sehgal Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2013-08-22 Impact factor: 8.086