| Literature DB >> 22473318 |
Dao-Cai Sun1, De-Hua Li, Hui-Cang Ji, Guo-Zhou Rao, Li-Hua Liang, Ai-Jie Ma, Chao Xie, Gui-Ke Zou, Ying-Liang Song.
Abstract
In order to understand the mechanisms of poor osseointegration following dental implants in type 2 diabetics, it is important to study the biological properties of alveolar bone osteoblasts isolated from these patients. We collected alveolar bone chips under aseptic conditions and cultured them in vitro using the tissue explants adherent method. The biological properties of these cells were characterized using the following methods: alkaline phosphatase (ALP) chemical staining for cell viability, Alizarin red staining for osteogenic characteristics, MTT test for cell proliferation, enzyme dynamics for ALP contents, radio-immunoassay for bone gla protein (BGP) concentration, and ELISA for the concentration of type I collagen (COL-I) in the supernatant. Furthermore, we detected the adhesion ability of two types of cells from titanium slices using non-specific immunofluorescence staining and cell count. The two cell forms showed no significant difference in morphology under the same culture conditions. However, the alveolar bone osteoblasts received from type 2 diabetic patients had slower growth, lower cell activity and calcium nodule formation than the normal ones. The concentration of ALP, BGP and COL-I was lower in the supernatant of alveolar bone osteoblasts received from type 2 diabetic patients than in that received from normal subjects (P < 0.05). The alveolar bone osteoblasts obtained from type 2 diabetic patients can be successfully cultured in vitro with the same morphology and biological characteristics as those from normal patients, but with slower growth and lower concentration of specific secretion and lower combining ability with titanium than normal ones.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22473318 PMCID: PMC3854304 DOI: 10.1590/s0100-879x2012007500054
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res ISSN: 0100-879X Impact factor: 2.590
Figure 1.Comparison of cell morphology (a) and mineralization (b) of osteoblast cells from a healthy patient and a type 2 diabetic patient. a, Morphology of cells from the type 2 diabetic patient that migrated out of tissue chips (Panel A; magnification: 200X). Cells from a healthy patient (Panel B; magnification 400X). Cells from a type 2 diabetic patient before passage in culture (Panel C; magnification: 200X). b, Cell mineralization showing high mineralization density of cells from a healthy patient (Panel A; magnification: 400X). Mineralization nodules formed from cells of the healthy patient (Panel B). Several mineralization nodules formed from cells of the type 2 diabetic patient (Panel C). Blue arrow indicates high mineralization density of cells. Red arrows indicate mineralization nodules.
Figure 2.Comparison of cell growth from the type 2 diabetic mellitus (DM) patient in low and high carbohydrate DMEM. The height of the column indicates the mean ± SD (*P < 0.05; one-way ANOVA).
Figure 3.Comparison of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining (a) and mineral nodules (b) of osteoblast cells from a healthy subject and from a type 2 diabetic patient. a, ALP staining of osteoblast cells from a type 2 diabetic patient (Panel A), and from a healthy patient (Panel B). b, Mineral nodules secreted by osteoblast cells from a type 2 diabetic patient (Panel A), and a healthy patient (Panel B). Arrows indicate mineral nodules after alkaline phosphatase staining.
Figure 4.Cell proliferation curve determined by the MTT assay.
Comparison of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), bone gla protein (BGP), and type I collagen (COL-I) concentration in the supernatant of cells from a diabetic patient and a healthy patient.
| Category | Day 2 | Day 4 | Day 6 | Day 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALP (mg/mL) | ||||
| Diabetic | 3.50 ± 0.25 | 3.84 ± 0.15 | 4.78 ± 0.16 | 5.28 ± 0.15 |
| Healthy | 4.69 ± 0.16 | 5.23 ± 0.21 | 7.08 ± 0.10 | 6.32 ± 0.14 |
| BGP (ng/mL) | ||||
| Diabetic | 2.77 ± 0.06 | 7.61 ± 0.03 | 12.43 ± 0.06 | 8.01 ± 0.01 |
| Healthy | 4.37 ± 0.09 | 13.81 ± 0.12 | 15.67 ± 0.11 | 14.99 ± 0.30 |
| COL-I (µg/L) | ||||
| Diabetic | 2.75 ± 0.23 | 2.98 ± 0.18 | 4.22 ± 0.21 | 2.51 ± 0.24 |
| Healthy | 4.08 ± 0.19 | 7.98 ± 0.21 | 8.75 ± 0.22 | 5.40 ± 0.19 |
Data are reported as means ± SD.
P < 0.05 compared to the diabetic patient (one-way ANOVA).
Figure 5.Comparison of morphology using immunofluorescence of cells from a healthy patient (A) and from a type 2 diabetic patient (B). Black arrows partly indicate cells of a healthy patient. White arrows partly indicate cells of a type 2 diabetic patient. There were no significant morphological differences and both adhered to the titanium slices.