OBJECTIVES: To evaluate somatostatin receptor 2A (SSTR2A) and dopamine receptor 2 (DR2) protein expression in somatotropinomas and to relate it to response to somatostatin analogues (SA). DESIGN AND PATIENTS: SSTR2A and DR2 expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in 88 somatotropinomas from patients submitted to either pre-surgical or adjuvant SA treatment. Tumors were scored according to percentage of immunostained cells: 0 (< 25%), 1 (25-50%), and 2 (> 50%). Relation between protein expression and response to SA was performed in 66 patients. Response to SA was assessed by percent IGF-I reduction, being considered as an IGF-I per cent reduction higher than 50%. Disease control was also assessed (GH < 1.0 ng/ml and normal IGF-I). RESULTS: SSTR2A and DR2 were expressed in 100% and 98% of tumors, respectively. Biochemical response and disease control rates were 48% and 32%, respectively. Median IGF-I percent reduction after 3 months of SA treatment was lower in the SSTR2A score 0 than in the scores 1 and 2 (p < 0.001, both), and after 6 months in the score 0 than in the score 1 (p = 0.001) and 2 (p < 0.001). Biochemical response and disease control were associated with SSTR2 expression (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). A negative predictive value for biochemical response of 100% was found when a SSTR2A expression < 25%of immunostained cells cut-off point was considered. No relation was found between DR2 expression and biochemical response and disease control. CONCLUSION: SSTR2A and DR2 are highly expressed in somatotropinomas. Low SSTR2A, but not DR2, expression is a negative predictive factor to response to SA.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate somatostatin receptor 2A (SSTR2A) and dopamine receptor 2 (DR2) protein expression in somatotropinomas and to relate it to response to somatostatin analogues (SA). DESIGN AND PATIENTS: SSTR2A and DR2 expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in 88 somatotropinomas from patients submitted to either pre-surgical or adjuvant SA treatment. Tumors were scored according to percentage of immunostained cells: 0 (< 25%), 1 (25-50%), and 2 (> 50%). Relation between protein expression and response to SA was performed in 66 patients. Response to SA was assessed by percent IGF-I reduction, being considered as an IGF-I per cent reduction higher than 50%. Disease control was also assessed (GH < 1.0 ng/ml and normal IGF-I). RESULTS: SSTR2A and DR2 were expressed in 100% and 98% of tumors, respectively. Biochemical response and disease control rates were 48% and 32%, respectively. Median IGF-I percent reduction after 3 months of SA treatment was lower in the SSTR2A score 0 than in the scores 1 and 2 (p < 0.001, both), and after 6 months in the score 0 than in the score 1 (p = 0.001) and 2 (p < 0.001). Biochemical response and disease control were associated with SSTR2 expression (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). A negative predictive value for biochemical response of 100% was found when a SSTR2A expression < 25%of immunostained cells cut-off point was considered. No relation was found between DR2 expression and biochemical response and disease control. CONCLUSION: SSTR2A and DR2 are highly expressed in somatotropinomas. Low SSTR2A, but not DR2, expression is a negative predictive factor to response to SA.
Authors: Giselle F Taboada; Ines Donangelo; Renata F C Guimarães; Mariangélica de O Silva; Rosita Fontes; Mônica R Gadelha Journal: Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol Date: 2006-03-16
Authors: A Saveanu; G Gunz; H Dufour; P Caron; F Fina; L Ouafik; M D Culler; J P Moreau; A Enjalbert; P Jaquet Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Giselle F Taboada; Raul M Luque; Wildebranham Bastos; Renata F C Guimarães; Jorge B Marcondes; Leila M C Chimelli; Rosita Fontes; Paulo J P Mata; Paulo Niemeyer Filho; Denise P Carvalho; Rhonda D Kineman; Mônica R Gadelha Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 6.664
Authors: M C Zatelli; D Piccin; F Tagliati; A Bottoni; M R Ambrosio; A Margutti; M Scanarini; M Bondanelli; M D Culler; E C degli Uberti Journal: J Mol Endocrinol Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 5.098
Authors: Pamela U Freda; Laurence Katznelson; Aart Jan van der Lely; Carlos M Reyes; Shouhao Zhao; Daniel Rabinowitz Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2005-05-10 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Diego Ferone; Wouter W de Herder; Rosario Pivonello; Johan M Kros; Peter M van Koetsveld; Ton de Jong; Francesco Minuto; Annamaria Colao; Steven W J Lamberts; Leo J Hofland Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2008-01-22 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: S Melmed; A Colao; A Barkan; M Molitch; A B Grossman; D Kleinberg; D Clemmons; P Chanson; E Laws; J Schlechte; M L Vance; K Ho; A Giustina Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2009-02-10 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Ana Paula M Casarini; Raquel S Jallad; Emília M Pinto; Iberê C Soares; Suely Nonogaki; Daniel Giannella-Neto; Nina R Musolino; Venâncio A F Alves; Marcello D Bronstein Journal: Pituitary Date: 2009 Impact factor: 4.107
Authors: Katja Kiseljak-Vassiliades; Mei Xu; Taylor S Mills; Elizabeth E Smith; Lori J Silveira; Kevin O Lillehei; Janice M Kerr; B K Kleinschmidt-DeMasters; Margaret E Wierman Journal: Mol Cell Endocrinol Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 4.102