Literature DB >> 22472791

Assessment of the immunogenicity and safety of varying doses of an MF59®-adjuvanted cell culture-derived A/H1N1 pandemic influenza vaccine in Japanese paediatric, adult and elderly subjects.

Hiroyuki Fukase1, Hidetoshi Furuie, Yuji Yasuda, Ryoya Komatsu, Kenji Matsushita, Taketsugu Minami, Yutaka Suehiro, Hiroshi Yotsuyanagi, Haruko Kusadokoro, Hiroshi Sawata, Noriko Nakura, Maria Lattanzi.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Effective vaccination strategies are required to combat future influenza pandemics. Here we report the results of three independent clinical trials performed in Japan to assess the immunogenicity, tolerability and safety of varying doses of a cell culture-derived MF59(®)-adjuvanted A/H1N1 pandemic vaccine in healthy Japanese paediatric, adult and elderly subjects.
METHODS: One hundred and twenty-three children (6 months-18 years), and 200 adults (19-60 years) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses of vaccine containing either 7.5 μg antigen with a full (9.75 mg) adjuvant dose, or 3.75 μg antigen with a half (4.875 mg) adjuvant dose. One hundred elderly (≥ 61 years) subjects received only the low antigen/adjuvant vaccine formulation. Immunogenicity was assessed by haemagglutination inhibition assay at baseline and three weeks after the first and second vaccine doses on Days 22 and 43, respectively. Solicited and unsolicited adverse reactions were recorded for seven and 21 days post-immunization, respectively.
RESULTS: In adult and elderly subjects, a single low antigen/adjuvant dose vaccination was sufficient to meet all of the three European licensure criteria established for influenza vaccines. One high, or two low antigen/adjuvant dose vaccinations were required to meet the licensure criteria in paediatric subjects. Both vaccine formulations were well tolerated, with the majority of adverse reactions mild to moderate in severity. None of the five serious adverse events reported throughout the three trials were considered to be vaccine-related by the investigators.
CONCLUSION: The use of MF59 adjuvant allows for much reduced vaccine antigen content, and a single dose administration schedule in adults and the elderly. The production of pandemic vaccine using modern cell culture techniques is highly advantageous in terms of the quantity, quality, and rapidity of antigen production; these benefits, in combination with the use of MF59, maximize manufacturing capacity and global vaccine supply. These data support the suitability of the investigational vaccine for use in the Japanese paediatric, adult, and elderly populations.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22472791     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.03.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  11 in total

Review 1.  Cell culture-based influenza vaccines: A necessary and indispensable investment for the future.

Authors:  Nagendra R Hegde
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Cell culture-derived flu vaccine: Present and future.

Authors:  Alberto Pérez Rubio; Jose María Eiros
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  A dose-ranging study of MF59(®)-adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted A/H1N1 pandemic influenza vaccine in young to middle-aged and older adult populations to assess safety, immunogenicity, and antibody persistence one year after vaccination.

Authors:  Keith S Reisinger; Sandra J Holmes; Paola Pedotti; Ashwani Kumar Arora; Maria Lattanzi
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Comparative Study on the Efficacy of MF 59, ISA70 VG, and Nano-Aluminum Hydroxide Adjuvants, Alone and with Nano-Selenium on Humoral Immunity Induced by a Bivalent Newcastle+Avian Influenza Vaccine in Chickens.

Authors:  M Radmehri; A Talebi; A Ameghi Roudsari; S M Mousaviyan; M A J Gholipour; M Taghizadeh
Journal:  Arch Razi Inst       Date:  2021-11-30

5.  Tolerability of 2 doses of pandemic influenza vaccine (Focetria®) and of a prior dose of seasonal 2009-2010 influenza vaccination in the Netherlands.

Authors:  N A T van der Maas; S Godefrooij; P E Vermeer-de Bondt; H E de Melker; J Kemmeren
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  HIV-Exposed Infants Vaccinated with an MF59/Recombinant gp120 Vaccine Have Higher-Magnitude Anti-V1V2 IgG Responses than Adults Immunized with the Same Vaccine.

Authors:  Sallie R Permar; Genevieve G Fouda; Erin P McGuire; Youyi Fong; Christopher Toote; Coleen K Cunningham; Elizabeth J McFarland; William Borkowsky; Susan Barnett; Hannah L Itell; Amit Kumar; Glenda Gray; M Julianna McElrath; Georgia D Tomaras
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Immunosenescence and novel vaccination strategies for the elderly.

Authors:  Michael G Dorrington; Dawn M E Bowdish
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 8.  Influenza vaccines: Evaluation of the safety profile.

Authors:  Claudia Maria Trombetta; Elena Gianchecchi; Emanuele Montomoli
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Safety and Immunogenicity of MF59-Adjuvanted Cell Culture-Derived A/H5N1 Subunit Influenza Virus Vaccine: Dose-Finding Clinical Trials in Adults and the Elderly.

Authors:  Sharon E Frey; Sepehr Shakib; Pornthep Chanthavanich; Peter Richmond; Timothy Smith; Terapong Tantawichien; Claudia Kittel; Peter Jaehnig; Zenaida Mojares; Bikash Verma; Niranjan Kanesa-Thasan; Matthew Hohenboken
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.835

10.  Effectiveness of A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza vaccine in adults recommended for annual influenza vaccination.

Authors:  Giedre Gefenaite; Margot Tacken; Jens Bos; Irina Stirbu-Wagner; Joke C Korevaar; Ronald P Stolk; Bert Wolters; Marc Bijl; Maarten J Postma; Jan Wilschut; Kristin L Nichol; Eelko Hak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.