BACKGROUND: Swedish population-based national health registers are widely used data sources in epidemiological research. Register-based diagnoses of Parkinson's disease have not been validated against clinical information. METHODS: Parkinson's disease (PD) and other parkinsonian disorder diagnoses were ascertained in two registers, i.e. the National Patient Register (NPR) and the Cause of Death Register (CDR). Diagnoses were validated in terms of accuracy (positive predictive value) and sensitivity against data from a population-based study of PD in 1998-2004 that screened more than 35,000 persons and identified 194 cases of parkinsonian disorders including 132 PD cases (the gold standard for the purposes of this study). RESULTS: Accuracy for any parkinsonian disorder diagnoses was 88.0% in the NPR and 94.4% in the CDR. Accuracy of PD diagnoses was 70.8% in the NPR and 66.7% in the CDR. Misclassification between differential parkinsonian diagnoses was common. The accuracy of PD diagnoses in the NPR improved to 83.0% by restricting the definition to primary diagnoses only. The sensitivity of PD diagnoses in the NPR and CDR combined was 83.1%, with a mean time to detection of 6.9 years. CONCLUSIONS: Population-based national health registers are valid data sources in epidemiological studies of PD or parkinsonian disorder etiology but are less suitable in studies of incidence or prevalence.
BACKGROUND: Swedish population-based national health registers are widely used data sources in epidemiological research. Register-based diagnoses of Parkinson's disease have not been validated against clinical information. METHODS:Parkinson's disease (PD) and other parkinsonian disorder diagnoses were ascertained in two registers, i.e. the National Patient Register (NPR) and the Cause of Death Register (CDR). Diagnoses were validated in terms of accuracy (positive predictive value) and sensitivity against data from a population-based study of PD in 1998-2004 that screened more than 35,000 persons and identified 194 cases of parkinsonian disorders including 132 PD cases (the gold standard for the purposes of this study). RESULTS: Accuracy for any parkinsonian disorder diagnoses was 88.0% in the NPR and 94.4% in the CDR. Accuracy of PD diagnoses was 70.8% in the NPR and 66.7% in the CDR. Misclassification between differential parkinsonian diagnoses was common. The accuracy of PD diagnoses in the NPR improved to 83.0% by restricting the definition to primary diagnoses only. The sensitivity of PD diagnoses in the NPR and CDR combined was 83.1%, with a mean time to detection of 6.9 years. CONCLUSIONS: Population-based national health registers are valid data sources in epidemiological studies of PD or parkinsonian disorder etiology but are less suitable in studies of incidence or prevalence.
Authors: I G McKeith; D Galasko; K Kosaka; E K Perry; D W Dickson; L A Hansen; D P Salmon; J Lowe; S S Mirra; E J Byrne; G Lennox; N P Quinn; J A Edwardson; P G Ince; C Bergeron; A Burns; B L Miller; S Lovestone; D Collerton; E N Jansen; C Ballard; R A de Vos; G K Wilcock; K A Jellinger; R H Perry Journal: Neurology Date: 1996-11 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: S Gilman; P Low; N Quinn; A Albanese; Y Ben-Shlomo; C Fowler; H Kaufmann; T Klockgether; A Lang; P Lantos; I Litvan; C Mathias; E Oliver; D Robertson; I Schatz; G Wenning Journal: Clin Auton Res Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 4.435
Authors: I Litvan; Y Agid; D Calne; G Campbell; B Dubois; R C Duvoisin; C G Goetz; L I Golbe; J Grafman; J H Growdon; M Hallett; J Jankovic; N P Quinn; E Tolosa; D S Zee Journal: Neurology Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Alexis Elbaz; James H Bower; Brett J Peterson; Demetrius M Maraganore; Shannon K McDonnell; J Eric Ahlskog; Daniel J Schaid; Walter A Rocca Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2003-01
Authors: Jonas F Ludvigsson; Eva Andersson; Anders Ekbom; Maria Feychting; Jeong-Lim Kim; Christina Reuterwall; Mona Heurgren; Petra Otterblad Olausson Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-06-09 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Alex Leigh Wojtowicz; Maziar Mohaddes; Daniel Odin; Erik Bülow; Szilard Nemes; Peter Cnudde Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Raquel C Gardner; James F Burke; Jasmine Nettiksimmons; Sam Goldman; Caroline M Tanner; Kristine Yaffe Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2015-03-28 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Bryan A Killinger; Zachary Madaj; Jacek W Sikora; Nolwen Rey; Alec J Haas; Yamini Vepa; Daniel Lindqvist; Honglei Chen; Paul M Thomas; Patrik Brundin; Lena Brundin; Viviane Labrie Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2018-10-31 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Adina L Feldman; Karin Wirdefeldt; Anna L V Johansson; Margaret Gatz; Nancy L Pedersen Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 8.082