Literature DB >> 22472551

Multimodality treatment of conus medullaris arteriovenous malformations: 2 decades of experience with combined endovascular and microsurgical treatments.

David A Wilson1, Adib A Abla, Timothy D Uschold, Cameron G McDougall, Felipe C Albuquerque, Robert F Spetzler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conus medullaris arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are rare, challenging spinal vascular lesions that cause progressive debilitating myeloradiculopathy. Only sporadic reports of conus AVMs have been published.
OBJECTIVE: To better define the presentation, prognosis, and optimal treatment of these lesions, we present the first case series of conus AVMs, reflecting over 2 decades of experience with a multimodality endovascular and surgical approach.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 16 patients with a conus AVM evaluated at our institution from 1989 to 2010. For each patient, the following clinical data were collected: age, sex, symptoms, angiographic findings, type of treatment, complications, degree of angiographic obliteration, recurrence at follow-up, and need for re-treatment. Ambulatory status, Frankel Grade, motor function, and bladder/bowel function were assessed before treatment, at discharge, and at last follow-up.
RESULTS: All 16 patients were treated. Eight (50%) patients underwent embolization followed by microsurgical resection, and 8 (50%) underwent microsurgical resection only. The rate of complete angiographic obliteration was 88%. At last follow-up (mean, 70 months), 43% of patients neurologically improved, 43% were stable, and 14% worsened in comparison with before treatment. During follow-up, 3 recurrences were detected, including the only 2 instances of long-term neurological decline. In the absence of recurrence, all patients ambulatory before treatment remained ambulatory at follow-up, whereas 75% of the initially nonambulatory patients regained the ability to walk.
CONCLUSION: Although conus AVMs are challenging to treat, excellent long-term outcomes are possible with a multimodality approach. Recurrence is associated with long-term neurological decline and calls for close follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22472551     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318256c042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  4 in total

Review 1.  Management of spinal aneurysms associated with arteriovenous malformations: systematic literature review and illustrative case.

Authors:  Bianca Baldassarre; Alberto Balestrino; Alessandro D'Andrea; Pasquale Anania; Marco Ceraudo; Monica Truffelli; Ilaria Melloni; Nicola Mavilio; Lucio Castellan; Gianluigi Zona; Pietro Fiaschi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Spinal vascular malformations: treatment strategies and outcome.

Authors:  Bruno C Flores; Daniel R Klinger; Jonathan A White; H Hunt Batjer
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Spinal Vascular Shunts: Single-Center Series and Review of the Literature of Their Classification.

Authors:  Jafeth Lizana; Nelida Aliaga; Walter Marani; Amanda Escribano; Nicola Montemurro
Journal:  Neurol Int       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 4.  Surgical and Endovascular Treatment for Spinal Arteriovenous Malformations.

Authors:  Toshiki Endo; Hidenori Endo; Kenichi Sato; Yasushi Matsumoto; Teiji Tominaga
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 1.742

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.