| Literature DB >> 22471966 |
Shu-sheng Liao1, Qin-yun Ruan, Mei-yan Lin, Lei Yan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Two-dimensional strain echocardiography (2DSE) technique has enabled accurate quantification of regional myocardial function. This experimental study was aimed to investigate the value of 2DSE in detection of segmental regional myocardial dysfunction induced by fibrosis following myocardial infarction in a small animal (rat) model.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22471966 PMCID: PMC3347994 DOI: 10.1186/1476-7120-10-17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound ISSN: 1476-7120 Impact factor: 2.062
The parameters of two dimensional echocardiography in rats at baseline and 4 weeks post-infarction
| Parameters | 4-weeks | Baseline | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LVIDd(cm) | 0.86 ± 0.04 | 0.67 ± 0.18 | < 0.05 |
| LVIDs(cm) | 0.65 ± 0.06 | 0.38 ± 0.12 | < 0.05 |
| LVEDV(ml) | 1.37 ± 0.18 | 0.71 ± 0.11 | < 0.05 |
| LVESV(ml) | 0.65 ± 0.17 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | < 0.01 |
| LVEF(%) | 52.77 ± 8.19 | 82.34 ± 3.51 | < 0.01 |
| FS(%) | 24.06 ± 5.07 | 43.34 ± 2.45 | < 0.05 |
The parameters of each of 6 segments derived from 2DSE in 17 rats at baseline and 4-weeks post-infarction
| Parameters | Infarct area | Peri-infarct area | Remote area | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anteroseptum | Anterior | Anterolateral | Inferoseptum | Inferolateral | Inferior | ||
| SR/%# | Baseline | 32.29 ± 9.55 | 32.90 ± 8.79 | 33.92 ± 10.03 | 35.27 ± 11.06 | 37.58 ± 9.35 | 37.98 ± 9.84 |
| 4-weeks | 11.60 ± 4.02* | 11.18 ± 3.89* | 21.85 ± 7.96* | 22.75 ± 4.78* | 31.72 ± 8.78 | 31.51 ± 6.55* | |
| SrR/s-1 | Baseline | 6.55 ± 1.18 | 6.28 ± 1.35 | 6.72 ± 1.20 | 7.38 ± 1.70 | 7.72 ± 1.27 | 7.79 ± 1.33 |
| 4-weeks | 3.66 ± 1.01* | 3.18 ± 0.47* | 4.24 ± 0.77* | 4.31 ± 1.51* | 4.64 ± 1.06* | 4.75 ± 1.33* | |
| SC/%# | Baseline | -14.12 ± 2.94 | -14.46 ± 2.21 | -12.69 ± 2.44 | -14.77 ± 3.43 | -11.95 ± 2.55 | -14.42 ± 3.15 |
| 4-weeks | -7.46 ± 1.39* | -6.30 ± 2.17* | -10.01 ± 2.15* | -11.35 ± 3.16* | -10.61 ± 2.05 | -12.97 ± 3.31 | |
| SrC/s-1 # | Baseline | 4.44 ± 0.63 | 4.9 ± 0.95 | 4.19 ± 0.82 | 4.69 ± 0.88 | 4.28 ± 0.58 | 4.79 ± 1.07 |
| 4-weeks | 3.52 ± 1.08* | 2.59 ± 1.16* | 3.10 ± 0.67* | 3.82 ± 1.21* | 3.19 ± 0.36* | 3.93 ± 0.54* | |
SR, Radial strain; SrR, Radial strain rate; SC, Circumferential strain; SrC, Circumferential strain rate
*4-weeks vs Baseline, P < 0.05; # Infarct area vs Peri-infarct area, P < 0.05; ▲Infarct area vs Remote area
Figure 1SR derived from 2DSE and Infarct area in histology. A: an example of left ventricular cross section of the normal heart stained by Masson trichrome; B: the maps of the peak systolic radial strain of the same heart; C: an example of left ventricular cross section of the heart with myocardial infarct that shows region with replacement fibrosis in blue; D: corresponding segmental peak systolic radial strain that shows significant reduction in the region of infarction.
Figure 2Scatter plot and Pearson's correlation of 2DSE parameters versus infarct size.
Figure 3ROC curve of strain and strain rate to identify segments with greater than 30% area of infarction.
Variabilities of Myocardial Strain and Strain Rate Measurement by 2-Dimensional Strain
| Radial strain | Circumferential strain | Radial strain rate | Circumferential strain rate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intraobserver | 5.8% | 7.6% | 6.3% | 8.5% |
| Interobserver | 6.1% | 6.9% | 8.0% | 11% |