Literature DB >> 22471258

Validation of Biodex system 4 for measuring the strength of muscles in patients with rectus diastasis.

Birgit Stark1, Peter Emanuelsson, Ulf Gunnarsson, Karin Strigård.   

Abstract

To investigate the validity and reliability of the Biodex system 4 in the assessment of abdominal strength in patients with rectus diastasis, we studied 10 healthy volunteers and 10 patients with rectus diastasis of more than 3 cm. We assessed test-retest reliability at 30(o) and 60(o) of extension/flexion spinal angles, respectively, and isometric muscle strength with and without the abdominal girdle. Reliability was calculated using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Validity was evaluated by correlation with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) for self-assessment of abdominal muscular strength. The Kendall-Tau and Spearman tests were used. Reliability was excellent with ICC values ranging between 0.77 and 0.97. There was no significant difference in muscular strength for tests with or without a girdle except with 60(o) extension. The internal validity assessed as the correlation between VAS and isometric strength (p = 0.008) was excellent, whereas there was no correlation with IPAQ. The Biodex system 4 is a valuable and reliable instrument to measure abdominal wall strength in patients with rectus diastasis. The internal validity is excellent. The incongruence between abdominal muscle strength, as measured using the Biodex system 4, and IPAQ indicates that there is no relation between general physical activity (IPAQ) and muscular strength in patients with rectus diastasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22471258     DOI: 10.3109/2000656X.2011.644707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Surg Hand Surg        ISSN: 2000-6764


  8 in total

Review 1.  Abdominal muscle function and incisional hernia: a systematic review.

Authors:  K K Jensen; M Kjaer; L N Jorgensen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Isometric abdominal wall muscle strength assessment in individuals with incisional hernia: a prospective reliability study.

Authors:  K K Jensen; M Kjaer; L N Jorgensen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Analysis of the abdominal musculo-aponeurotic anatomy in rectus diastasis: comparison of CT scanning and preoperative clinical assessment with direct measurement intraoperatively.

Authors:  P Emanuelsson; U Dahlstrand; U Strömsten; U Gunnarsson; K Strigård; B Stark
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 4.  Physical activity recommendations pre and post abdominal wall reconstruction: a scoping review of the evidence.

Authors:  S T Adams; N H Bedwani; L H Massey; A Bhargava; C Byrne; K K Jensen; N J Smart; C J Walsh
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.920

5.  Giant ventral hernia-relationship between abdominal wall muscle strength and hernia area.

Authors:  K Strigård; L Clay; B Stark; U Gunnarsson; P Falk
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Diastasis recti abdominis during pregnancy and 12 months after childbirth: prevalence, risk factors and report of lumbopelvic pain.

Authors:  Jorun Bakken Sperstad; Merete Kolberg Tennfjord; Gunvor Hilde; Marie Ellström-Engh; Kari Bø
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  One-year outcome after repair of giant incisional hernia using synthetic mesh or full-thickness skin graft: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  V Holmdahl; B Stark; L Clay; U Gunnarsson; K Strigård
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Predictive Factors in the Outcome of Surgical Repair of Abdominal Rectus Diastasis.

Authors:  Karin Strigård; Leonard Clay; Birgit Stark; Ulf Gunnarsson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-05-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.