BACKGROUND: Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients presenting with cervical lymph nodes (LN) metastases (M) have a variable outcome. The objective of this study is to assess the value of meticulous histopathologic examination and genotyping in stratifying these patients into clinically relevant prognostic subgroups. METHODS: This was a retrospective clinical and histopathological review of PTC patients with lymph node metastases at presentation identified between 1980 and 2002 in a single institution. Primary tumors from patients who later recurred were matched to a group of patients who did not recur and subjected to mass spectrometry genotyping encompassing the most significant oncogenes in thyroid carcinomas. RESULTS: There were 246 patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up was 10.8 years. The presence of >3 metastatic nodes was an independent predictor of decreased recurrence free survival (p=0.03). In patients <45 years, none of 45 with 1-2 metastatic LN recurred, including 26 patients followed for a median of 13 years without radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy. BRAF mutations were found in 28 (78%) of 36 genotyped tumors. Combined positivity for BRAF and extra-nodal extension was much stronger in predicting disease specific survival (DSS) (p=0.004) than the single analysis of BRAF (p=0.12) or extra-nodal extension (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: (i) The number of metastatic LN is an independent predictor of recurrence in all age groups and identifies a subset of young patients with excellent prognosis who may not benefit from RAI therapy. (ii) Combined positivity for BRAF and extra-nodal extension has additive prognostic value in predicting DSS. (iii) Classification systems that assign the same magnitude of risk for recurrence or death to all patients with N1 disease should be revisited.
BACKGROUND:Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients presenting with cervical lymph nodes (LN) metastases (M) have a variable outcome. The objective of this study is to assess the value of meticulous histopathologic examination and genotyping in stratifying these patients into clinically relevant prognostic subgroups. METHODS: This was a retrospective clinical and histopathological review of PTC patients with lymph node metastases at presentation identified between 1980 and 2002 in a single institution. Primary tumors from patients who later recurred were matched to a group of patients who did not recur and subjected to mass spectrometry genotyping encompassing the most significant oncogenes in thyroid carcinomas. RESULTS: There were 246 patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up was 10.8 years. The presence of >3 metastatic nodes was an independent predictor of decreased recurrence free survival (p=0.03). In patients <45 years, none of 45 with 1-2 metastatic LN recurred, including 26 patients followed for a median of 13 years without radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy. BRAF mutations were found in 28 (78%) of 36 genotyped tumors. Combined positivity for BRAF and extra-nodal extension was much stronger in predicting disease specific survival (DSS) (p=0.004) than the single analysis of BRAF (p=0.12) or extra-nodal extension (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: (i) The number of metastatic LN is an independent predictor of recurrence in all age groups and identifies a subset of young patients with excellent prognosis who may not benefit from RAI therapy. (ii) Combined positivity for BRAF and extra-nodal extension has additive prognostic value in predicting DSS. (iii) Classification systems that assign the same magnitude of risk for recurrence or death to all patients with N1 disease should be revisited.
Authors: David T Hughes; Matthew L White; Barbra S Miller; Paul G Gauger; Richard E Burney; Gerard M Doherty Journal: Surgery Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: R Michael Tuttle; Hernan Tala; Jatin Shah; Rebecca Leboeuf; Ronald Ghossein; Mithat Gonen; Matvey Brokhin; Gal Omry; James A Fagin; Ashok Shaha Journal: Thyroid Date: 2010-10-29 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: David S Cooper; Gerard M Doherty; Bryan R Haugen; Bryan R Hauger; Richard T Kloos; Stephanie L Lee; Susan J Mandel; Ernest L Mazzaferri; Bryan McIver; Furio Pacini; Martin Schlumberger; Steven I Sherman; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle Journal: Thyroid Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Cleo Mesa; Mana Mirza; Norisato Mitsutake; Maureen Sartor; Mario Medvedovic; Craig Tomlinson; Jeffrey A Knauf; Georg F Weber; James A Fagin Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-07-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Sophie Leboulleux; Carole Rubino; Eric Baudin; Bernard Caillou; Dana M Hartl; Jean-Michel Bidart; Jean-Paul Travagli; Martin Schlumberger Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2005-07-19 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Julio C Ricarte-Filho; Mabel Ryder; Dhananjay A Chitale; Michael Rivera; Adriana Heguy; Marc Ladanyi; Manickam Janakiraman; David Solit; Jeffrey A Knauf; R Michael Tuttle; Ronald A Ghossein; James A Fagin Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-06-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: J A Knauf; M A Sartor; M Medvedovic; E Lundsmith; M Ryder; M Salzano; Y E Nikiforov; T J Giordano; R A Ghossein; J A Fagin Journal: Oncogene Date: 2011-03-07 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Mi Kyung Shin; Jeong Won Kim; Soo Kee Min; Dong Jin Lee; Jin Hwan Kim; Seung Chul Lee; Bong Wha Chung; Young Su Ju Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2015-06-22 Impact factor: 2.967
Authors: Henning Dralle; Thomas J Musholt; Jochen Schabram; Thomas Steinmüller; Andreja Frilling; Dietmar Simon; Peter E Goretzki; Bruno Niederle; Christian Scheuba; Thomas Clerici; Michael Hermann; Jochen Kußmann; Kerstin Lorenz; Christoph Nies; Peter Schabram; Arnold Trupka; Andreas Zielke; Wolfram Karges; Markus Luster; Kurt W Schmid; Dirk Vordermark; Hans-Joachim Schmoll; Reinhard Mühlenberg; Otmar Schober; Harald Rimmele; Andreas Machens Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2013-03-03 Impact factor: 3.445