Literature DB >> 22470843

Factors affecting response rates to mailed preoperative surveys among arthroplasty patients.

Wenbao Wang1, Jeffrey A Geller, Abraham Kim, Todd A Morrison, Jung Keun Choi, William Macaulay.   

Abstract

AIM: To identify factors that affect patient response rates to preoperative functional surveys in hip and knee arthroplasty patients.
METHODS: From May 2008 to March 2009, 247 patients were scheduled more than 4 wk in advance for hip or knee arthroplasty by one of two participating surgeons at our center. A personalized questionnaire comprised of the Short Form 12 (SF-12) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Index was mailed to patients at random time points ranging from 7 to 101 d prior to surgery. Nine independent factors were documented prospectively, including age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, type of surgery, surgeon, days prior to surgery (DPS) of survey mailing, WOMAC score and SF-12 score. The date of the completed survey receipt was also documented. For non-responders, the surveys were completed with the research team at the hospital upon admission. Multivariate regression and χ(2) analysis were performed with Statistical Analysis Software software.
RESULTS: DPS was the only factor that affected patient response. Mailing surveys 26 d to 31 d prior to surgery dates led to a peak response rate of 80% that was significantly higher (P < 0.023) than response rates for patients who were mailed their surveys ≤ 16 d (62.5%), 17 d to 25 d (70%) or ≥ 32 d prior to surgery (55%). No other factors, including preoperative WOMAC and SF-12 scores, significantly influenced response behavior.
CONCLUSION: The DPS was independently the most significant predictor of response rates for pre-operative functional data among patients scheduled for hip and knee arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Factor analysis; Preoperative survey; Response rate

Year:  2012        PMID: 22470843      PMCID: PMC3302048          DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v3.i1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Orthop        ISSN: 2218-5836


  9 in total

1.  Routine follow-up office visits after total joint replacement: do asymptomatic patients wish to comply?

Authors:  V Sethuraman; J McGuigan; W J Hozack; P F Sharkey; R H Rothman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires.

Authors:  P Edwards; I Roberts; M Clarke; C DiGuiseppi; S Pratap; R Wentz; I Kwan; R Cooper
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

3.  Comparison of the responsiveness of the SF-36 and WOMAC in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nelson Fong Soohoo; Raj M Vyas; David B Samimi; Ricardo Molina; Jay R Lieberman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Investigating non-response bias in mail surveys.

Authors:  K Sheikh; S Mattingly
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 5.  Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Olivier Ethgen; Olivier Bruyère; Florent Richy; Charles Dardennes; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Measuring tools for functional outcomes in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert B Bourne
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Patient-reported outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty: comparison of midterm results.

Authors:  Vikki Wylde; Ashley W Blom; Sarah L Whitehouse; Adrian H Taylor; Giles T Pattison; Gordon C Bannister
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Interpretations of the clinical outcomes of the nonresponders to mail surveys in patients after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sae Kwang Kwon; Yeon Gwi Kang; Chong Bum Chang; Sang Cheol Sung; Tae Kyun Kim
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Response bias: effect on outcomes evaluation by mail surveys after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jane Kim; Jess H Lonner; Charles L Nelson; Paul A Lotke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.284

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.