Literature DB >> 22470079

Timing of cholecystectomy after mild biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review.

Mark C van Baal1, Marc G Besselink, Olaf J Bakker, Hjalmar C van Santvoort, Alexander F Schaapherder, Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs, Hein G Gooszen, Bert van Ramshorst, Djamila Boerma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the risk of recurrent biliary events in the period after mild biliary pancreatitis but before interval cholecystectomy and to determine the safety of cholecystectomy during the index admission.
BACKGROUND: Although current guidelines recommend performing cholecystectomy early after mild biliary pancreatitis, consensus on the definition of early (ie, during index admission or within the first weeks after hospital discharge) is lacking.
METHODS: We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for studies published from January 1992 to July 2010. Included were cohort studies of patients with mild biliary pancreatitis reporting on the timing of cholecystectomy, number of readmissions for recurrent biliary events before cholecystectomy, operative complications (eg, bile duct injury, bleeding), and mortality. Study quality and risks of bias were assessed.
RESULTS: After screening 2413 studies, 8 cohort studies and 1 randomized trial describing 998 patients were included. Cholecystectomy was performed during index admission in 483 patients (48%) without any reported readmissions. Interval cholecystectomy was performed in 515 patients (52%) after 40 days (median; interquartile range: 19-58 days). Before interval cholecystectomy, 95 patients (18%) were readmitted for recurrent biliary events (0% vs 18%, P < 0.0001). These included recurrent biliary pancreatitis (n = 43, 8%), acute cholecystitis (n = 17), and biliary colics (n = 35). Patients who had an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography had fewer recurrent biliary events (10% vs 24%, P = 0.001), especially less recurrent biliary pancreatitis (1% vs 9%). There were no differences in operative complications, conversion rate (7%), and mortality (0%) between index and interval cholecystectomy. Because baseline characteristics were only reported in 26% of patients, study populations could not be compared.
CONCLUSIONS: Interval cholecystectomy after mild biliary pancreatitis is associated with a high risk of readmission for recurrent biliary events, especially recurrent biliary pancreatitis. Cholecystectomy during index admission for mild biliary pancreatitis appears safe, but selection bias could not be excluded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22470079     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182507646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  44 in total

1.  Implementation of a novel emergency surgical unit significantly improves the management of gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  S Bokhari; M Kulendran; L Liasis; K Qurashi; M Sen; S Gould
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Management of acute pancreatitis in the first 72 hours.

Authors:  Theodore W James; Seth D Crockett
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.287

3.  The impact of empiric endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy on future gallstone-related complications in patients with non-severe acute biliary pancreatitis whose cholecystectomy was deferred or not performed.

Authors:  Wiriyaporn Ridtitid; Santi Kulpatcharapong; Panida Piyachaturawat; Phonthep Angsuwatcharakon; Pradermchai Kongkam; Rungsun Rerknimitr
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Cholecystectomy During Index Admission for Acute Biliary Pancreatitis Lowers 30-Day Readmission Rates.

Authors:  Somashekar G Krishna; Andrew J Kruger; Nishi Patel; Alice Hinton; Dhiraj Yadav; Darwin L Conwell
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 5.  Pancreatic Disorders.

Authors:  Aliye Uc; Douglas S Fishman
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.278

6.  Validation of the acute cholecystectomy rate as a quality indicator for emergency general surgery using the SWORD database.

Authors:  T R Palser; A P Navarro; S Swift; I J Beckingham
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute mild gallstone pancreatitis: how early is safe?

Authors:  Pablo Giuffrida; David Biagiola; Agustín Cristiano; Victoria Ardiles; Martín de Santibañes; Rodrigo Sanchez Clariá; Juan Pekolj; Eduardo de Santibañes; Oscar Mazza
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-02-03

8.  The use of imaging in acute pancreatitis in United Kingdom hospitals: findings from a national quality of care study.

Authors:  Simon John McPherson; Derek A O'Reilly; Martin T Sinclair; Neil Smith
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016.

Authors:  Susumu Tazuma; Michiaki Unno; Yoshinori Igarashi; Kazuo Inui; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Masahiro Kai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Toshiyuki Mori; Koji Yamaguchi; Shomei Ryozawa; Yuji Nimura; Naotaka Fujita; Keiichi Kubota; Junichi Shoda; Masami Tabata; Tetsuya Mine; Kentaro Sugano; Mamoru Watanabe; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 7.527

10.  Early versus delayed cholecystectomy following endoscopic sphincterotomy for mild biliary pancreatitis.

Authors:  Brett D Mador; O Neely M Panton; S Morad Hameed
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.