(18)F-FDG cell labeling may underestimate transplanted cell homing: more accurate, efficient, and stable cell labeling with hexadecyl-4-[(18)F]fluorobenzoate for in vivo tracking of transplanted human progenitor cells by positron emission tomography.

Cell therapy is expected to restore perfusion and improve function in the ischemic/infarcted myocardium; however, the biological mechanisms and local effects of transplanted cells remain unclear. To assess cell fate in vivo, hexadecyl-4-[(18)F]fluorobenzoate ((18)F-HFB) cell labeling was evaluated for tracking human circulating progenitor cells (CPCs) with positron emission tomography (PET) and was compared to the commonly used 2-[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose ((18)F-FDG) labeling method in a rat myocardial infarction model. CPCs were labeled with 18F-HFB or (18)F-FDG ex vivo under the same conditions. (18)F-HFB cell-labeling efficiency (23.4 ± 7.5%) and stability (4 h, 88.4 ± 6.0%) were superior to (18)F-FDG (7.6 ± 4.1% and 26.6 ± 6.1%, respectively; p < 0.05). Neither labeling approach significantly altered cell viability, phenotype or migration potential up to 24 h postlabeling. Two weeks after left anterior descending coronary artery ligation, rats received echo-guided intramyocardial injection in the infarct border zone with (18)F-HFB-CPCs, (18)F-FDG-CPCs, (18)F-HFB, or (18)F-FDG. Dynamic PET imaging of both (18)F-HFB-CPCs and(18)F-FDG-CPCs demonstrated that only 16-37% of the initial injection dose (ID) was retained in the injection site at 10 min postdelivery, and remaining activity fell significantly over the first 4 h posttransplantation. The (18)F-HFB-CPC signal in the target area at 2 h (23.7 ± 14.7% ID/g) and 4 h (17.6 ± 13.3% ID/g) postinjection was greater than that of (18)F-FDG-CPCs (5.4 ± 2.3% ID/g and 2.6 ± 0.7% ID/g, respectively;p < 0.05). Tissue biodistribution confirmed the higher radioactivity in the border zone of (18)F-HFB-CPC rats. Immunostaining of heart tissue sections revealed no significant difference in cell retention between two labeled cell transplantation groups. Good correlation with biodistribution results was observed in the (18)F-HFB-CPC rats (r = 0.81, p < 0.05). Compared to (18)F-FDG, labeling human CPCs with(18)F-HFB provides a more efficient, stable, and accurate way to quantify the distribution of transplanted cells. (18)F-HFB cell labeling with PET imaging offers a better modality to enhance our understanding of early retention, homing, and engraftment with cardiac cell therapy.