BACKGROUND: Peach allergy is regarded as one of the most important fresh fruit allergies. Data are available on the state-of-the-art diagnosis, including food challenges, and a component-resolved diagnosis. However, the roles played by different peach allergens with respect to symptom severity are not completely understood. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of serum specific IgE to peach and recombinant allergens in the diagnosis of peach allergies in Italian children. METHODS: Forty-four children with peach allergy confirmed by a placebo-controlled food challenge were divided into 2 groups based on their symptom severity: patients with mild oral allergy syndrome (OAS) and patients with systemic symptoms (SS). The presence of specific IgE to peach and rPru p 1, rPru p 3, and rPru p 4 was determined. RESULTS: The presence of specific IgE to Pru p 4 and Pru p 1 was found significantly more frequently in patients with OAS, whereas specific IgE to Pru p 3 was not found significantly more frequently in patients with SS. Only anti-rPru p 4 IgE levels were significantly higher in patients with OAS, whereas no significant differences were found in anti-rPru p 1 and anti-rPru p 3 IgE levels between patients with OAS compared with patients with SS. CONCLUSION: In Italian children with peach allergies, the presence of specific IgE to Pru p 3 is not associated with SS, and the levels of specific IgE to Pru p 3 do not correlate with the severity of the reactions.
BACKGROUND:Peachallergy is regarded as one of the most important fresh fruit allergies. Data are available on the state-of-the-art diagnosis, including food challenges, and a component-resolved diagnosis. However, the roles played by different peach allergens with respect to symptom severity are not completely understood. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of serum specific IgE to peach and recombinant allergens in the diagnosis of peachallergies in Italian children. METHODS: Forty-four children with peachallergy confirmed by a placebo-controlled food challenge were divided into 2 groups based on their symptom severity: patients with mild oral allergy syndrome (OAS) and patients with systemic symptoms (SS). The presence of specific IgE to peach and rPru p 1, rPru p 3, and rPru p 4 was determined. RESULTS: The presence of specific IgE to Pru p 4 and Pru p 1 was found significantly more frequently in patients with OAS, whereas specific IgE to Pru p 3 was not found significantly more frequently in patients with SS. Only anti-rPru p 4 IgE levels were significantly higher in patients with OAS, whereas no significant differences were found in anti-rPru p 1 and anti-rPru p 3 IgE levels between patients with OAS compared with patients with SS. CONCLUSION: In Italian children with peachallergies, the presence of specific IgE to Pru p 3 is not associated with SS, and the levels of specific IgE to Pru p 3 do not correlate with the severity of the reactions.