Literature DB >> 22469115

Standardisation of clinical breast-density measurement.

Kwan-Hoong Ng1, Cheng-Har Yip, Nur Aishah Mohd Taib.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2012        PMID： 22469115     DOI： 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70093-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN： 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  Impact of positional difference on the measurement of breast density using MRI.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Siwa Chan; Yi-Ting Tang; Jia Shen Hon; Po-Chuan Tseng; Angela T Cheriyan; Nikita Rakesh Shah; Dah-Cherng Yeh; San-Kan Lee; Wen-Pin Chen; Christine E McLaren; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Mammographic density is not a worthwhile examination to distinguish high cancer risk women in screening.

Authors:  Catherine Colin; Anne-Marie Schott; Pierre-Jean Valette
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Beyond BI-RADS Density: A Call for Quantification in the Breast Imaging Clinic.

Authors:  Emily F Conant; Brian L Sprague; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  A new automated method to evaluate 2D mammographic breast density according to BI-RADS® Atlas Fifth Edition recommendations.

Authors:  Corinne Balleyguier; Julia Arfi-Rouche; Bruno Boyer; Emilien Gauthier; Valerie Helin; Ara Loshkajian; Stephane Ragusa; Suzette Delaloge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Opportunistic Breast Density Assessment in Women Receiving Low-dose Chest Computed Tomography Screening.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Siwa Chan; Nan-Han Lu; Yifan Li; Yu Chieh Tsai; Po Yun Huang; Chia-Ju Chang; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 6.  Imaging Breast Density: Established and Emerging Modalities.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Gultekin Gulsen; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.243

7.  Subjective Versus Quantitative Methods of Assessing Breast Density.

Authors:  Wijdan Alomaim; Desiree O'Leary; John Ryan; Louise Rainford; Michael Evanoff; Shane Foley
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-21

8.  Comparing Visually Assessed BI-RADS Breast Density and Automated Volumetric Breast Density Software: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Breast Cancer Screening Setting.

Authors:  Daniëlle van der Waal; Gerard J den Heeten; Ruud M Pijnappel; Klaas H Schuur; Johanna M H Timmers; André L M Verbeek; Mireille J M Broeders
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms: a validation study.

Authors:  Albert Gubern-Mérida; Michiel Kallenberg; Bram Platel; Ritse M Mann; Robert Martí; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.