Literature DB >> 22468802

Inhibitory control in memory: evidence for negative priming in free recall.

John E Marsh1, C Philip Beaman, Robert W Hughes, Dylan M Jones.   

Abstract

Cognitive control mechanisms--such as inhibition--decrease the likelihood that goal-directed activity is ceded to irrelevant events. Here, we use the action of auditory distraction to show how retrieval from episodic long-term memory is affected by competitor inhibition. Typically, a sequence of to-be-ignored spoken distracters drawn from the same semantic category as a list of visually presented to-be-recalled items impairs free recall performance. In line with competitor inhibition theory (Anderson, 2003), free recall was worse for items on a probe trial if they were a repeat of distracter items presented during the previous, prime, trial (Experiment 1). This effect was produced only when the distracters were dominant members of the same category as the to-be-recalled items on the prime. For prime trials in which distracters were low-dominant members of the to-be-remembered item category or were unrelated to that category--and hence not strong competitors for retrieval--positive priming was found (Experiments 2 and 3). These results are discussed in terms of inhibitory approaches to negative priming and memory retrieval. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22468802     DOI: 10.1037/a0027849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  10 in total

1.  Memory as discrimination: what distraction reveals.

Authors:  C Philip Beaman; Maciej Hanczakowski; Helen M Hodgetts; John E Marsh; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-11

2.  Frontotemporal Coherence and Executive Functions Contribute to Episodic Memory During Middle Childhood.

Authors:  Tashauna L Blankenship; Martha Ann Bell
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.253

3.  Frontotemporal function]al connectivity and executive functions contribute to episodic memory performance.

Authors:  Tashauna L Blankenship; Meagan O'Neill; Kirby Deater-Deckard; Rachel A Diana; Martha Ann Bell
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.997

4.  Boundaries of semantic distraction: dominance and lexicality act at retrieval.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Nick Perham; Patrik Sörqvist; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-11

5.  Updating working memory in aircraft noise and speech noise causes different fMRI activations.

Authors:  Bjørn Saetrevik; Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2014-10-28

6.  Erroneous and veridical recall are not two sides of the same coin: Evidence from semantic distraction in free recall.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Robert W Hughes; Patrik Sörqvist; C Philip Beaman; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 7.  ICBEN review of research on the biological effects of noise 2011-2014.

Authors:  Mathias Basner; Mark Brink; Abigail Bristow; Yvonne de Kluizenaar; Lawrence Finegold; Jiyoung Hong; Sabine A Janssen; Ronny Klaeboe; Tony Leroux; Andreas Liebl; Toshihito Matsui; Dieter Schwela; Mariola Sliwinska-Kowalska; Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.867

8.  How Concentration Shields Against Distraction.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; John E Marsh
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-08

9.  Negative priming in free recall reconsidered.

Authors:  Maciej Hanczakowski; C Philip Beaman; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 10.  Neurobiology of Anorexia Nervosa: Serotonin Dysfunctions Link Self-Starvation with Body Image Disturbances through an Impaired Body Memory.

Authors:  Giuseppe Riva
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.