AIM: To assess attitudes and trends regarding the use of high-dose infliximab among pediatric gastroenterologists for treatment of pediatric ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: A 19-item survey was distributed to subscribers of the pediatric gastroenterology (PEDSGI) listserv. Responses were submitted anonymously and results compiled in a secure website. RESULTS: A total of 113 subscribers (88% based in the United States) responded (101 pediatric gastroenterology attendings and 12 pediatric gastroenterology fellows). There were 46% in academic medical institutions and 39% in hospital-based practices. The majority (91%) were treating >10 patients with UC; 13% were treating >100 patients with UC; 91% had prescribed infliximab (IFX) 5 mg/kg for UC; 72% had prescribed IFX 10 mg/kg for UC. Using a 5-point Likert scale, factors that influenced the decision not to increase IFX dosing in patients with UC included: "improvement on initial dose of IFX" (mean: 3.88) and "decision to move to colectomy" (3.69). Lowest mean Likert scores were: "lack of guidelines or literature regarding increased IFX dosing" (1.96) and "insurance authorization or other insurance issues" (2.34). "Insurance authorization or other insurance issues" was identified by 39% as at least somewhat of a factor (Likert score ≥ 3) in their decision not to increase the IFX dose. IFX 10 mg/kg was more commonly used for the treatment of pediatric UC among responders based in the United States (75/100) compared to non-United States responders (6/13, P = 0.047). Induction of remission was reported by 78% of all responders and 81% reported maintenance of remission with IFX 10 mg/kg. One responder reported one death with IFX 10 mg/kg. CONCLUSION: IFX 10 mg/kg is more commonly used in the United States to treat pediatric UC. Efficacy and safety data are required to avoid insurance barriers for its use.
AIM: To assess attitudes and trends regarding the use of high-dose infliximab among pediatric gastroenterologists for treatment of pediatric ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: A 19-item survey was distributed to subscribers of the pediatric gastroenterology (PEDSGI) listserv. Responses were submitted anonymously and results compiled in a secure website. RESULTS: A total of 113 subscribers (88% based in the United States) responded (101 pediatric gastroenterology attendings and 12 pediatric gastroenterology fellows). There were 46% in academic medical institutions and 39% in hospital-based practices. The majority (91%) were treating >10 patients with UC; 13% were treating >100 patients with UC; 91% had prescribed infliximab (IFX) 5 mg/kg for UC; 72% had prescribed IFX 10 mg/kg for UC. Using a 5-point Likert scale, factors that influenced the decision not to increase IFX dosing in patients with UC included: "improvement on initial dose of IFX" (mean: 3.88) and "decision to move to colectomy" (3.69). Lowest mean Likert scores were: "lack of guidelines or literature regarding increased IFX dosing" (1.96) and "insurance authorization or other insurance issues" (2.34). "Insurance authorization or other insurance issues" was identified by 39% as at least somewhat of a factor (Likert score ≥ 3) in their decision not to increase the IFX dose. IFX 10 mg/kg was more commonly used for the treatment of pediatric UC among responders based in the United States (75/100) compared to non-United States responders (6/13, P = 0.047). Induction of remission was reported by 78% of all responders and 81% reported maintenance of remission with IFX 10 mg/kg. One responder reported one death with IFX 10 mg/kg. CONCLUSION:IFX 10 mg/kg is more commonly used in the United States to treat pediatric UC. Efficacy and safety data are required to avoid insurance barriers for its use.
Authors: Jean Frédéric Colombel; William J Sandborn; Walter Reinisch; Gerassimos J Mantzaris; Asher Kornbluth; Daniel Rachmilewitz; Simon Lichtiger; Geert D'Haens; Robert H Diamond; Delma L Broussard; Kezhen L Tang; C Janneke van der Woude; Paul Rutgeerts Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Paul Rutgeerts; William J Sandborn; Brian G Feagan; Walter Reinisch; Allan Olson; Jewel Johanns; Suzanne Travers; Daniel Rachmilewitz; Stephen B Hanauer; Gary R Lichtenstein; Willem J S de Villiers; Daniel Present; Bruce E Sands; Jean Frédéric Colombel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-12-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Filip Baert; Maja Noman; Severine Vermeire; Gert Van Assche; Geert D' Haens; An Carbonez; Paul Rutgeerts Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-02-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Petar Mamula; Jonathan E Markowitz; Louis J Cohen; Daniel von Allmen; Robert N Baldassano Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: G R Lichtenstein; R H Diamond; C L Wagner; A A Fasanmade; A D Olson; C W Marano; J Johanns; Y Lang; W J Sandborn Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2009-04-21 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Jeffrey S Hyams; Trudy Lerer; Anne Griffiths; Marian Pfefferkorn; Michael Stephens; Jonathan Evans; Anthony Otley; Ryan Carvalho; David Mack; Athos Bousvaros; Joel Rosh; Andrew Grossman; Gitit Tomer; Marsha Kay; Wallace Crandall; Maria Oliva-Hemker; David Keljo; Neal LeLeiko; James Markowitz Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2010-01-26 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Carlos Taxonera; David Olivares; Juan L Mendoza; Manuel Díaz-Rubio; Enrique Rey Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-07-21 Impact factor: 5.742