Literature DB >> 22467280

In vivo biofunctionality comparison of different topographic PLLA scaffolds.

Bit Na Lee1, Da Yeon Kim, Hwi Ju Kang, Jin Seon Kwon, Young Hwan Park, Heung Jae Chun, Jae Ho Kim, Hai Bang Lee, Byoung Hyun Min, Moon Suk Kim.   

Abstract

In this work, the in vivo biodegradation of, biocompatibility of, and host response to various topographic scaffolds were investigated. Randomly oriented fibrous poly(L-lactide) (PLLA) nanofibers were fabricated using the electrospinning technique. A PLLA scaffold was obtained by salt leaching. Both the electrospun PLLA nanofibers and the salt-leaching PLLA scaffolds formed three-dimensional pore structures. Cytotoxicity studies, in which rat muscle-derived stem cells (rMDSCs) were grown on electrospun PLLA nanofibers or the salt-leaching PLLA scaffolds, revealed that the rMDSCs cell count on the PLLA nanofibers was slightly higher than that on the salt-leaching PLLA scaffolds. An in vivo study was carried out by implanting the scaffolds subcutaneously into rats to test the biodegradation, biocompatibility, and host response at regular intervals over 0-4 weeks. The degradation of the PLLA nanofibers 1, 2, and 4 weeks after initial implantation was more extensive than that observed for the salt-leaching PLLA scaffolds. PLLA nanofibers seeded the growth of larger fibrous tissue masses due to in vivo cellular infiltration into the randomly oriented fibrillar structures of the PLLA nanofibers. In addition, the inflammatory cell accumulation in PLLA nanofibers was lower than that in the salt-leaching PLLA scaffolds. These results indicate that the electrospun PLLA nanofibers may serve as a good scaffold to elicit fibrous cellular infiltration, to minimize host response, and to enhance tissue-scaffold integration.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22467280     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  7 in total

1.  Improved cellular infiltration in electrospun fiber via engineered porosity.

Authors:  Jin Nam; Yan Huang; Sudha Agarwal; John Lannutti
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2007-09

2.  Exploring the dermal "template effect" and its structure.

Authors:  Yuzhi Jiang; Shuliang Lu
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  In vivo biocompatibility evaluation of electrospun composite scaffolds by subcutaneous implantation in rat.

Authors:  Amit K Jaiswal; Rohit V Dhumal; Jayesh R Bellare; Geeta R Vanage
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.617

4.  Supermacroporous poly(vinyl alcohol)-carboxylmethyl chitosan-poly(ethylene glycol) scaffold: an in vitro and in vivo pre-assessments for cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Si-Yuen Lee; Ai-Sze Wee; Chin-Keong Lim; Azlina Amir Abbas; Lakshmi Selvaratnam; Azhar Mahmood Merican; Tunku Sara Ahmad; Tunku Kamarul
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Preparation and Evaluation of Dexamethasone-Loaded Electrospun Nanofiber Sheets as a Sustained Drug Delivery System.

Authors:  Jin Woo Lee; Hye Yun Lee; Seung Hun Park; Ji Hoon Park; Jae Ho Kim; Byoung Hyun Min; Moon Suk Kim
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Immature Testicular Tissue Engineered from Weaned Mice to Adults for Prepubertal Fertility Preservation-An In Vivo Translational Study.

Authors:  How Tseng; Yung-Liang Liu; Buo-Jia Lu; Chi-Huang Chen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  The effects of poly L-lactic acid nanofiber scaffold on mouse spermatogonial stem cell culture.

Authors:  Neda Eslahi; Mahmoud Reza Hadjighassem; Mohammad Taghi Joghataei; Tooba Mirzapour; Mehrdad Bakhtiyari; Malak Shakeri; Vahid Pirhajati; Peymaneh Shirinbayan; Morteza Koruji
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2013-11-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.