Literature DB >> 22466910

Conversion from everolimus with low-exposure cyclosporine to everolimus with mycophenolate sodium maintenance therapy in kidney transplant recipients: a randomized, open-label multicenter study.

Laetitia Albano1, Eric Alamartine, Olivier Toupance, Bruno Moulin, Pierre Merville, Jean Philippe Rerolle, Rachel Tetaz, Marie-Christine Moal, Nassim Kamar, Christophe Legendre, Stéphane Quéré, Fabienne Di Giambattista, Arara Terpereau, Jacques Dantal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data in kidney transplant recipients regarding elimination of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy from a de novo regimen based on low CNI exposure and an mTOR inhibitor are sparse, and restricted to CNI elimination within the first six months post-transplant. MATERIAL/
METHODS: In a 12-month, randomized, multicenter, open-label study, kidney transplant patients who had received everolimus, low-exposure cyclosporine and corticosteroids from transplantation to month 12 (with proteinuria <1 g/24 h at month 12) were randomized to convert from cyclosporine to mycophenolate sodium 720 mg/day with increased everolimus exposure (6-10 ng/mL [CNI-free group], n=15) or continue unchanged (everolimus 3-8 ng/mL [CNI group], n=15).
RESULTS: Median (range) baseline mGFR was 54 (21-87) mL/min and 37 (range 18-69) mL/min (p=0.053) in the CNI-free and CNI groups, respectively, compared to 56 (18-126) mL/min and 32 (12-63) mL/min at month 12 (p=0.007). The between-group difference in change in mGFR from baseline to month 12 post-conversion (the primary endpoint) was -14.4 mL/min (95% CI -29.3 to 0.6 mL/min, p=0.059 [least squares mean]). Changes in serum creatinine and estimated GFR to month 12 were significantly in favor of CNI-free patients. One CNI patient experienced biopsy-proven acute rejection. Study drug was discontinued due to adverse events in one CNI-free patient (7%) and three CNI-treated patients (20.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: Elimination of CNI from a de novo regimen of everolimus with low-exposure CNI at one year post-transplant maintained efficacy and led to a non-significant but clinically relevant improvement in renal function, although patients numbers were low (n=30). Findings from this small study require confirmation in a larger controlled trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22466910     DOI: 10.12659/aot.882637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transplant        ISSN: 1425-9524            Impact factor:   1.530


  3 in total

Review 1.  Calcineurin inhibitor sparing strategies in renal transplantation, part one: Late sparing strategies.

Authors:  Andrew Scott Mathis; Gwen Egloff; Hoytin Lee Ghin
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-06-24

2.  A comparison of mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitor as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Authors:  Jin Deng; Yi Lu; Lihong He; Jihong Ou; Hongping Xie
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 0.973

3.  Influence of cyclosporine and everolimus on the main mycophenolate mofetil pharmacokinetic parameters: Cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Aurelija Noreikaitė; Franck Saint-Marcoux; Pierre Marquet; Edmundas Kaduševičius; Edgaras Stankevičius
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.