BACKGROUND: Adolescent depression needs to be identified and treated in the primary care settings. There is no clinician-rated measure validated in India for identifying depression among adolescents. AIM: We studied the diagnostic accuracy, reliability, and validity of Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) for primary care pediatrics. SETTING AND DESIGN: Prospective study in three schools in Southern India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adolescents recruited were administered the CDRS-R by a pediatrician and clinical psychologist along with Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) for convergent validity. Impact of Event Scale (IES) for divergent validity and the ICD-10 clinical diagnosis of depressive disorders using modified Kiddie-SADS-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL) interview as reference standard were administered by a psychiatrist independently. Appropriate statistical analyses for diagnostic accuracy, reliability, and validity were done. RESULTS: A cut-off score of 30 (sensitivity = 83%, specificity = 84%; AUC in ROC = 87%) in CDRS-R is suggested for diagnosing depression. The inter-rater reliability (r = 0.73) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.98) was good. In addition to the adequate face and content validity, CDRS-R had good internal consistency (α = 0.76), high convergent (r = 0.71; P = 0.001), and divergent validity (r = 0.28; P = 0.20). There was moderate concordance with the reference standard of ICD-10 diagnosis (45.5%) in identifying depression and CDRS-R discriminated 80% of the other psychiatric morbidity. The six-factor structure explained 60.6% of variance. CONCLUSION: The CDRS-R showed strong psychometric properties and is now available for use in the primary-care pediatric practice in India.
BACKGROUND: Adolescent depression needs to be identified and treated in the primary care settings. There is no clinician-rated measure validated in India for identifying depression among adolescents. AIM: We studied the diagnostic accuracy, reliability, and validity of Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) for primary care pediatrics. SETTING AND DESIGN: Prospective study in three schools in Southern India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adolescents recruited were administered the CDRS-R by a pediatrician and clinical psychologist along with Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) for convergent validity. Impact of Event Scale (IES) for divergent validity and the ICD-10 clinical diagnosis of depressive disorders using modified Kiddie-SADS-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL) interview as reference standard were administered by a psychiatrist independently. Appropriate statistical analyses for diagnostic accuracy, reliability, and validity were done. RESULTS: A cut-off score of 30 (sensitivity = 83%, specificity = 84%; AUC in ROC = 87%) in CDRS-R is suggested for diagnosing depression. The inter-rater reliability (r = 0.73) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.98) was good. In addition to the adequate face and content validity, CDRS-R had good internal consistency (α = 0.76), high convergent (r = 0.71; P = 0.001), and divergent validity (r = 0.28; P = 0.20). There was moderate concordance with the reference standard of ICD-10 diagnosis (45.5%) in identifying depression and CDRS-R discriminated 80% of the other psychiatric morbidity. The six-factor structure explained 60.6% of variance. CONCLUSION: The CDRS-R showed strong psychometric properties and is now available for use in the primary-care pediatric practice in India.
Authors: Maria H Kim; Alick C Mazenga; Xiaoying Yu; Saeed Ahmed; Mary E Paul; Peter N Kazembe; Elaine J Abrams Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2017-03-30 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Maria H Kim; Alick C Mazenga; Akash Devandra; Saeed Ahmed; Peter N Kazembe; Xiaoying Yu; Chi Nguyen; Carla Sharp Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2014-07-30 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Maria H Kim; Alick C Mazenga; Xiaoying Yu; Akash Devandra; Chi Nguyen; Saeed Ahmed; Peter N Kazembe; Carla Sharp Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 3.630