Literature DB >> 22465945

Chest compression quality management and return of spontaneous circulation: a matched-pair registry study.

Roman-Patrik Lukas1, Jan Thorsten Gräsner, Stephan Seewald, Rolf Lefering, Thomas Peter Weber, Hugo Van Aken, Matthias Fischer, Andreas Bohn.   

Abstract

AIMS: Investigating the effects of any intervention during cardiac arrest remains difficult. The ROSC after cardiac arrest score was introduced to facilitate comparison of rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) between different ambulance services. To study the influence of chest compression quality management (including training, real-time feedback devices, and debriefing) in comparison with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), a matched-pair analysis was conducted using data from the German Resuscitation Registry, with the calculated ROSC after cardiac arrest score as the baseline. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Matching for independent ROSC after cardiac arrest score variables yielded 319 matched cases from the study period (January 2007-March 2011). The score predicted a 45% ROSC rate for the matched pairs. The observed ROSC increased significantly with chest compression quality management, to 52% (P=0.013; 95% CI, 46-57%). No significant differences were seen in the conventional CPR group (47%; 95% CI, 42-53%). The difference between the observed ROSC rates was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Chest compression quality management leads to significantly higher ROSC rates than those predicted by the prognostic score (ROSC after cardiac arrest score). Matched-pair analysis shows that with conventional CPR, the observed ROSC rate was not significantly different from the predicted rate. Analysis shows a trend toward a higher ROSC rate for chest compression quality management in comparison with conventional CPR. It is unclear whether a single aspect of chest compression quality management or the combination of training, real-time feedback, and debriefing contributed to this result.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22465945     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.03.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Mechanical resuscitation assist devices].

Authors:  M Fischer; M Breil; M Ihli; M Messelken; S Rauch; J-C Schewe
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Differences between manual CPR and corpuls cpr in regard to quality and outcome: study protocol of the comparing observational multi-center prospective registry study on resuscitation (COMPRESS).

Authors:  S Seewald; S Dopfer; J Wnent; B Jakisch; M Heller; R Lefering; J T Gräsner
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  The System-Wide Effect of Real-Time Audiovisual Feedback and Postevent Debriefing for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality Improvement Initiative.

Authors:  Keith Couper; Peter K Kimani; Benjamin S Abella; Mehboob Chilwan; Matthew W Cooke; Robin P Davies; Richard A Field; Fang Gao; Sarah Quinton; Nigel Stallard; Sarah Woolley; Gavin D Perkins
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Assessing practical skills in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Discrepancy between standard visual evaluation and a mechanical feedback device.

Authors:  Baltasar Sánchez González; Laura Martínez; Manel Cerdà; Enrique Piacentini; Josep Trenado; Salvador Quintana
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Automated mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation devices versus manual chest compressions in the treatment of cardiac arrest: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing machine to human.

Authors:  Manuel Obermaier; Johannes B Zimmermann; Erik Popp; Markus A Weigand; Sebastian Weiterer; Alexander Dinse-Lambracht; Claus-Martin Muth; Benedikt L Nußbaum; Jan-Thorsten Gräsner; Stephan Seewald; Katrin Jensen; Svenja E Seide
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Adult Basic Life Support: International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Theresa M Olasveengen; Mary E Mancini; Gavin D Perkins; Suzanne Avis; Steven Brooks; Maaret Castrén; Sung Phil Chung; Julie Considine; Keith Couper; Raffo Escalante; Tetsuo Hatanaka; Kevin K C Hung; Peter Kudenchuk; Swee Han Lim; Chika Nishiyama; Giuseppe Ristagno; Federico Semeraro; Christopher M Smith; Michael A Smyth; Christian Vaillancourt; Jerry P Nolan; Mary Fran Hazinski; Peter T Morley
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  Real-time audiovisual feedback system in a physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service in Finland: the quality results and barriers to implementation.

Authors:  Marko Sainio; Antti Kämäräinen; Heini Huhtala; Petri Aaltonen; Jyrki Tenhunen; Klaus T Olkkola; Sanna Hoppu
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Monitoring of in-hospital cardiac arrest events with the focus on Automated External Defibrillators--a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Thomas Wurmb; Tina Vollmer; Peter Sefrin; Martin Kraus; Oliver Happel; Christian Wunder; Andreas Steinisch; Norbert Roewer; Sebastian Maier
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Application of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation devices and their value in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective analysis of the German Resuscitation Registry.

Authors:  Stephan Seewald; Manuel Obermaier; Rolf Lefering; Andreas Bohn; Michael Georgieff; Claus-Martin Muth; Jan-Thorsten Gräsner; Siobhán Masterson; Jens Scholz; Jan Wnent
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.