Literature DB >> 22465826

Impact of computerized physician order entry on medication errors.

M D Menendez1, J Alonso, I Rancaño, J J Corte, V Herranz, F Vazquez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Information is scarce on the impact of the clinical electronic record on the frequency and severity of medication errors in acute geriatric patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: An analytical and descriptive pre-post study was conducted on the implementation of computerized provider order entry systems (CPOE), over a 6 year period. A voluntary reporting system was used to detect the medication errors using the IR2 report form of the UK National Health Service, the Global Trigger Tool and the walk rounds with the Pharmacy Service. The severity categories were taken from the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP) Index Categorizing Errors.
RESULTS: A total of 1887 medication errors (1553 patients) were detected in the period of study, and represented the first adverse event reported (29.3%). 8.5 adverse events per 100 admissions were found (0.24 in the categories E through I) and the prescription errors represented a 27.6%. By drugs dispensed, adverse events were 2.07 times more frequent in the 3 year period (2007-2009) with electronic clinical record than in the 3 year period with the hand-written system (2004-2006), being more frequent with antibiotics (1.92 times), antipyretic (2.21 times) and opiates (2.72 times). For serious errors and by doses dispensed, there were 5.18 times less frequent serious errors in the period related to the electronic record, drug omission (46.8 times less frequent), wrong dose (10.53 times) and antibiotics (10.84 times).
CONCLUSION: Frequent medication errors were found in acute geriatric patients. An increase in medication errors and a decline in the severity of the detected errors were found in relationship to the electronic clinical record. For these reasons, the implementation of the electronic clinical record should be monitored.
Copyright © 2011 SECA. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22465826     DOI: 10.1016/j.cali.2012.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Calid Asist        ISSN: 1134-282X


  7 in total

1.  Does electronic medication reconciliation at hospital discharge decrease prescription medication errors?

Authors:  Geneve M Allison; Bernard Weigel; Christina Holcroft
Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur       Date:  2015

2.  Position statement: medical toxicologist participation in medication management and safety systems.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2015-03

3.  Technology-induced errors associated with computerized provider order entry software for older patients.

Authors:  Manuel Vélez-Díaz-Pallarés; Ana María Álvarez Díaz; Teresa Gramage Caro; Noelia Vicente Oliveros; Eva Delgado-Silveira; María Muñoz García; Alfonso José Cruz-Jentoft; Teresa Bermejo-Vicedo
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2017-05-24

4.  Implementation of a Cloud-Based Electronic Medical Record to Reduce Gaps in the HIV Treatment Continuum in Rural Kenya.

Authors:  John Haskew; Gunnar Rø; Kenrick Turner; Davies Kimanga; Martin Sirengo; Shahnaaz Sharif
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  The effectiveness of computerized order entry at reducing preventable adverse drug events and medication errors in hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Teryl K Nuckols; Crystal Smith-Spangler; Sally C Morton; Steven M Asch; Vaspaan M Patel; Laura J Anderson; Emily L Deichsel; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2014-06-04

6.  Risk factors for medication errors in the electronic and manual prescription.

Authors:  Cris Renata Grou Volpe; Eveline Maria Magalhães de Melo; Lucas Barbosa de Aguiar; Diana Lúcia Moura Pinho; Marina Morato Stival
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2016-08-08

7.  Incidence, causes, and consequences of preventable adverse drug reactions occurring in inpatients: A systematic review of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Dianna Wolfe; Fatemeh Yazdi; Salmaan Kanji; Lisa Burry; Andrew Beck; Claire Butler; Leila Esmaeilisaraji; Candyce Hamel; Mona Hersi; Becky Skidmore; David Moher; Brian Hutton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.