Literature DB >> 22464951

Test-retest reliability of 3D ultrasound measurements of the thoracic spine.

Christian Fölsch1, Stefanie Schlögel, Stefan Lakemeier, Udo Wolf, Nina Timmesfeld, Adrian Skwara.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the reliability of the Zebris CMS 20 ultrasound analysis system with pointer application for measuring end-range flexion, end-range extension, and neutral kyphosis angle of the thoracic spine.
SETTING: The study was performed within the School of Physiotherapy in cooperation with the Orthopedic Department at a University Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The thoracic spines of 28 healthy subjects were measured.
METHODS: Measurements for neutral kyphosis angle, end-range flexion, and end-range extension were taken once at each time point. The bone landmarks were palpated by one examiner and marked with a pointer containing 2 transmitters using a frequency of 40 kHz. A third transmitter was fixed to the pelvis, and 3 microphones were used as receiver. The real angle was calculated by the software. Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement, intraclass correlations (ICC), standard deviations of mean measurements, and standard error of measurements were used for statistical analyses. The test-retest reliability in this study was measured within a 24-hour interval. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Statistical parameters were used to judge reliability.
RESULTS: The mean kyphosis angle was 44.8° with a standard deviation of 17.3° at the first measurement and a mean of 45.8° with a standard deviation of 16.2° the following day. The ICC was high at 0.95 for the neutral kyphosis angle, and the Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement were within clinical acceptable margins. The ICC was 0.71 for end-range flexion and 0.34 for end-range extension, whereas the Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement were wider than with the static measurement of kyphosis. Compared with static measurements, the analysis of motion with 3-dimensional ultrasound showed an increased standard deviation for test-retest measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: The test-retest reliability of ultrasound measuring of the neutral kyphosis angle of the thoracic spine was demonstrated within 24 hours. Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement and the standard deviation of differences did not appear to be clinically acceptable for measuring flexion and extension.
Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22464951     DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PM R        ISSN: 1934-1482            Impact factor:   2.298


  6 in total

1.  Intrarater and interrater reliability of the flexicurve index, flexicurve angle, and manual inclinometer for the measurement of thoracic kyphosis.

Authors:  Eva Barrett; Karen McCreesh; Jeremy Lewis
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2013-12-12

2.  Comparing the effects of different dynamic sitting strategies in wheelchair seating on lumbar-pelvic angle.

Authors:  Chun-Ting Li; Yao-Te Peng; Yen-Ting Tseng; Yen-Nien Chen; Kuen-Horng Tsai
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Comparison of spinal curvature parameters as determined by the ZEBRIS spine examination method and the Cobb method in children with scoliosis.

Authors:  Mária Takács; Zsanett Orlovits; Bence Jáger; Rita M Kiss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Use of Reflective Tape to Detect Ultrasound Transducer Movement: A Validation Study.

Authors:  Lisa Mohr; Lutz Vogt; Jan Wilke
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-30

Review 5.  Analysis of the Active Measurement Systems of the Thoracic Range of Movements of the Spine: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Pablo Esteban-González; Eleuterio A Sánchez-Romero; Jorge Hugo Villafañe
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  The effects of backward adjustable thoracic support in wheelchair on spinal curvature and back muscle activation for elderly people.

Authors:  Chun-Ting Li; Yen-Nien Chen; Chih-Han Chang; Kuen-Horng Tsai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.