Literature DB >> 22464823

Cytotoxic potential of vasoconstrictor experimental gingival retraction agents: in vitro study on primary human gingival fibroblasts.

D Nowakowska1, J Saczko, J Kulbacka, A Choromanska, Z Raszewski.   

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of the vasoconstrictor experimental gingival retraction agents (VEGRAs) in a dynamic setting. The strong cytotoxic effects of the astringent-based conventional gingival retraction agents (ACGRAs) on human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) in vitro was our motivation to evaluate the biocompatibility of the vasoconstrictor-based experimental gingival retraction agents (VEGRAs) for the selected minimally invasive chemical agent. These agents were used to create three self-made retraction gels. Human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) were treated with two groups of retraction agents: 1) three α- and β-adrenergic agents (VEGRA-αβ-s) based on 0.1%, 0.01% and 0.05% HCl-epinephrine, and 2) seven α-adrenergic agents (VEGRA-α-s), including two commercially available 0.05% HCl-tetrahydrozoline solutions, one 0.05% HCl-oxymetazoline solution, 10% HCl-phenylephrine solution, and three new self-made experimental 0.05% HCl-tetrahydro zoline-based gels. The methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) colorimetric assay was performed to determine the oxidoreductive mitochondrial function after 3, 5, 10 min and 24 h of incubation. The cytotoxic effect, measured by cell viability lower than the 50% threshold, was not observed at any time period, even 24 h after application of 0.05% HCl-tetrahydrozolinebased self-manufactured retraction gels. High cell viability values of human gingival fibroblasts after the treatment with the three self-made 0.05% HCl-tetrahydrozoline- based gels may serve as a basis for further studies aimed at selecting the best retraction agents biocompatible with gingival margin tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22464823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Folia Biol (Praha)        ISSN: 0015-5500            Impact factor:   0.906


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of alpha-adrenomimetic agents for gingival retraction: A randomized crossover clinical trial.

Authors:  Neha Mehra; Ajita Rathi; Roshni Sharma; Mamta Kaushik; Tanushree Sood
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2020-08-20

2.  Bleeding Index and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 as Gingival Inflammation Parameters after Chemical-Mechanical Retraction Procedure.

Authors:  Marko Igic; Milena Kostic; Jelena Basic; Nebojsa Krunic; Ana Pejcic; Nikola Gligorijevic; Aleksandra Milic Lemic
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 1.927

3.  In vitro effects of vasoconstrictive retraction agents on primary human gingival fibroblasts.

Authors:  Danuta Nowakowska; Jolanta Saczko; Anna Szewczyk; Olga Michel; Marek Ziętek; Joanna Weżgowiec; Włodzimierz Więckiewicz; Julita Kulbacka
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  A comparative evaluation of amount of gingival displacement produced by four different gingival displacement agents - An in vivo study.

Authors:  Zainab Ilyas Kesari; Jyoti Tipin Karani; Saloni Sharad Mistry; Ashutosh Ramesh Pai
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2019-10-10

5.  Effect of Contamination with Hemostatic Agent on Shear Bond Strength of Composite to Dentin Using G-Premio and Single Bond Universal Adhesives.

Authors:  Zahra Khamverdi; Naemeh Karimian; Maryam Farhadian; Hamed Gheitouli
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2021-07-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.