Literature DB >> 22464543

Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex tumors: comparison of perioperative outcomes.

Jean-Alexandre Long1, Rachid Yakoubi, Byron Lee, Julien Guillotreau, Riccardo Autorino, Humberto Laydner, Remi Eyraud, Robert J Stein, Jihad H Kaouk, Georges-Pascal Haber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies showed that robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) offered outcomes at least comparable to those of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). LPN can be particularly challenging for more complex tumors.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing LPN or RPN for a single renal mass of moderate or high complexity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective analysis was performed for 381 consecutive patients who underwent either LPN (n = 182) or RPN (n = 199) between 2005 and 2011 for a complex renal mass (RENAL score ≥ 7). Perioperative outcomes were compared. Predictors of postoperative renal function were assessed using multivariable linear regression analysis. INTERVENTION: LPN or RPN. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Perioperative outcomes were compared. Predictors of postoperative renal function were assessed using multivariable linear regression analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to patient age, gender, side, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), or tumor size. Patients undergoing LPN had a slightly lower body mass index (29.2 kg/m(2) compared with 30.7 kg/m(2), p = 0.02) and preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (81.1 compared with 86.0 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), p = 0.02). LPN was associated with an increased rate of conversion to radical nephrectomy (RN) (11.5% compared with 1%, p<0.001) and a higher decrease in percentage of eGFR (-16.0% compared with -12.6%, p = 0.03). There were no significant differences with respect to warm ischemia time (WIT), estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, or postoperative complications. WIT, preoperative eGFR, and CCI were found to be predictors of postoperative eGFR in multivariable analysis. No difference in perioperative outcomes was found between moderate and high RENAL score subgroups. The retrospective study design was the main limitation of this study.
CONCLUSIONS: RPN provides functional outcomes comparable to those of LPN for moderate- to high-complexity tumors, but with a significantly lower risk of conversion to RN. This situation is likely because of the technical advantages offered by the articulated robotic instruments. A prospective randomized study is needed to confirm these findings.
Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22464543     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  31 in total

1.  Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for localized renal tumors: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaolong Zhang; Jiajun Yan; Yu Ren; Chong Shen; Xiangrong Ying; Shouhua Pan
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

2.  Perioperative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy for intrarenal tumors.

Authors:  Kevin M Curtiss; Mark W Ball; Michael A Gorin; Kelly T Harris; Phillip M Pierorazio; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 3.  Laparascopic nephrectomy: different techniques and approaches.

Authors:  Tania González León
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Organ-sparing procedures in GU cancer: part 1-organ-sparing procedures in renal and adrenal tumors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Raouf Seyam; Mahmoud I Khalil; Mohamed H Kamel; Waleed M Altaweel; Rodney Davis; Nabil K Bissada
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Trends in surgical management of T1 renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jonas Schiffmann; Marco Bianchi; Maxine Sun; Andreas Becker
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Diffusion of robotics into clinical practice in the United States: process, patient safety, learning curves, and the public health.

Authors:  Hossein S Mirheydar; J Kellogg Parsons
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy without using ureteral stent: a single center experience.

Authors:  Burak Özkan; Enis Rauf Coşkuner; Veli Yalçın
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-03

Review 8.  Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Endophytic Tumors.

Authors:  Dae Keun Kim; Christos Komninos; Lawrence Kim; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Robotic and open partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: a matched-pair comparison with a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Yubin Wang; Jinkai Shao; Xin Ma; Qingshan Du; Huijie Gong; Xu Zhang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Partial nephrectomy versus ablative therapy for the treatment of renal tumors in an imperative setting.

Authors:  Jean-Alexandre Long; Jean-Christophe Bernhard; Pierre Bigot; Cecilia Lanchon; Philippe Paparel; Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq; Laurence Albiges; Thomas Bodin; François-Xavier Nouhaud; Romain Boissier; Pierre Gimel; Arnaud Méjean; Alexandra Masson-Lecomte; Nicolas Grenier; Francois Cornelis; Yohann Grassano; Vincent Comat; Quentin Come Le Clerc; Jérome Rigaud; Laurent Salomon; Jean-Luc Descotes; Christian Sengel; Morgan Roupret; Gregory Verhoest; Idir Ouzaid; Valentin Arnoux; Karim Bensalah
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.