OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare temporally separated vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiopoietin (Ang)-1 delivery with concomitant delivery or single VEGF delivery, for therapeutic angiogenesis in chronic ischemia. BACKGROUND: Single gene delivery of VEGF results in immature neovessels that ultimately regress. Endogenously, VEGF acts early to initiate angiogenesis, whereas Ang-1 acts later to induce vessel maturation. Timing VEGF and Ang-1 gene delivery to mimic endogenous angiogenesis might be more effective for sustained neovascularization. METHODS: Unilateral hindlimb ischemia was induced in 170 rats. Ultrasound-mediated gene delivery was performed with cationic microbubbles and plasmid deoxyribonucleic acid. Groups included VEGF at 2 weeks, VEGF/Ang-1 at 2 weeks, VEGF at 2 weeks with Ang-1 at 4 weeks, and untreated control subjects. At 2, 4, and 8 weeks after ligation, blood flow and flow reserve (FR) were assessed by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Vascular density, organization, and supporting cell coverage were assessed by fluorescent microangiography and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: In untreated control subjects, blood flow, FR, and vessel density remained reduced. The VEGF delivery improved flow and vessel density at 4 weeks; however, FR remained low, supporting cell coverage was poor, and flow and vessel density regressed by 8 weeks. The VEGF/Ang-1 co-delivery marginally increased flow and vessel density; however, FR and supporting cell coverage improved. After temporally separated VEGF and Ang-1 delivery, blood flow, vessel density, and FR increased and were sustained, with improved pericyte coverage at 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, temporally separated VEGF and Ang-1 gene therapy results in sustained and functional neovascularization.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare temporally separated vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiopoietin (Ang)-1 delivery with concomitant delivery or single VEGF delivery, for therapeutic angiogenesis in chronic ischemia. BACKGROUND: Single gene delivery of VEGF results in immature neovessels that ultimately regress. Endogenously, VEGF acts early to initiate angiogenesis, whereas Ang-1 acts later to induce vessel maturation. Timing VEGF and Ang-1 gene delivery to mimic endogenous angiogenesis might be more effective for sustained neovascularization. METHODS: Unilateral hindlimb ischemia was induced in 170 rats. Ultrasound-mediated gene delivery was performed with cationic microbubbles and plasmid deoxyribonucleic acid. Groups included VEGF at 2 weeks, VEGF/Ang-1 at 2 weeks, VEGF at 2 weeks with Ang-1 at 4 weeks, and untreated control subjects. At 2, 4, and 8 weeks after ligation, blood flow and flow reserve (FR) were assessed by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Vascular density, organization, and supporting cell coverage were assessed by fluorescent microangiography and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: In untreated control subjects, blood flow, FR, and vessel density remained reduced. The VEGF delivery improved flow and vessel density at 4 weeks; however, FR remained low, supporting cell coverage was poor, and flow and vessel density regressed by 8 weeks. The VEGF/Ang-1 co-delivery marginally increased flow and vessel density; however, FR and supporting cell coverage improved. After temporally separated VEGF and Ang-1 delivery, blood flow, vessel density, and FR increased and were sustained, with improved pericyte coverage at 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, temporally separated VEGF and Ang-1 gene therapy results in sustained and functional neovascularization.