Literature DB >> 22464138

Practice nurses and obesity: professional and practice-based factors affecting role adequacy and role legitimacy.

Christine Nolan1, Ann Deehan, Ann Wylie, Roger Jones.   

Abstract

AIM: This qualitative study explored the professional and practice-based factors affecting the role legitimacy and adequacy of practice nurses in managing obese patients.
BACKGROUND: There are strong clinical, financial and practical reasons for tackling obesity in UK general practice. Although practice nurses may seem to be in an ideal position to manage obesity, there remain questions about their role adequacy (sense of self-efficacy in responding to patients' problems) and role legitimacy (their perceived boundaries of professional responsibility and right to intervene).
METHODS: Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with 22 practice nurses in Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham in South London. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed. Key themes were identified following coding of the data. Findings Factors that positively affected nurses' role adequacy and legitimacy were: their belief that obesity management was part of their chronic disease management and health promotion remit; their confidence in their own communication skills and ability to build rapport with patients; having attended training and being supported to take extra time for obesity management. Factors negatively affecting their role legitimacy and adequacy were: their low awareness and use of guidance; lack of knowledge of referral options; limited knowledge and use of non-medical and non-persuasive approaches; perceived lack of expertise in motivating patients, as well as in nutrition, child obesity and assessment; belief that there were some contexts in which it was more appropriate to raise the issue than others; lack of culturally appropriate materials and language barriers; belief that they had limited impact on outcome and that the patient is responsible for lack of success. Other factors negatively affecting their role adequacy and legitimacy included their ambivalence about the effectiveness of the interventions offered; perceived lack of priority for obesity management within practices; lack of time; workload and lack of clarity on protocols and roles within the practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22464138     DOI: 10.1017/S1463423612000059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev        ISSN: 1463-4236            Impact factor:   1.458


  14 in total

1.  Impact of the 5As Team study on clinical practice in primary care obesity management: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jodie Asselin; Eniola Salami; Adedayo M Osunlana; Ayodele A Ogunleye; Andrew Cave; Jeffrey A Johnson; Arya M Sharma; Denise L Campbell-Scherer
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-04-26

2.  Interventions targeted at primary care practitioners to improve the identification and referral of patients with co-morbid obesity: a realist review protocol.

Authors:  David N Blane; Sara Macdonald; David Morrison; Catherine A O'Donnell
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-01

3.  Patient and practice characteristics predicting attendance and completion at a specialist weight management service in the UK: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  David N Blane; Philip McLoone; David Morrison; Sara Macdonald; Catherine A O'Donnell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  The role of primary care in adult weight management: qualitative interviews with key stakeholders in weight management services.

Authors:  David N Blane; Sara Macdonald; David Morrison; Catherine A O'Donnell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Weight assessment and the provision of weight management advice in primary care: a cross-sectional survey of self-reported practice among general practitioners and practice nurses in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Nathan Critchlow; Gillian Rosenberg; Harriet Rumgay; Robert Petty; Jyotsna Vohra
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Lifestyle interventions in primary health care: professional and organizational challenges.

Authors:  Therese Kardakis; Lars Weinehall; Lars Jerdén; Monica E Nyström; Helene Johansson
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.367

7.  Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of primary prevention and health promotion activities in primary care: a synthesis through meta-ethnography.

Authors:  Maria Rubio-Valera; Mariona Pons-Vigués; María Martínez-Andrés; Patricia Moreno-Peral; Anna Berenguera; Ana Fernández
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Missing an opportunity: the embedded nature of weight management in primary care.

Authors:  J Asselin; A M Osunlana; A A Ogunleye; A M Sharma; D Campbell-Scherer
Journal:  Clin Obes       Date:  2015-08-25

9.  Implementation of clinical practice guidelines on lifestyle interventions in Swedish primary healthcare - a two-year follow up.

Authors:  Therese Kardakis; Lars Jerdén; Monica E Nyström; Lars Weinehall; Helene Johansson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 10.  What works and why in the identification and referral of adults with comorbid obesity in primary care: A realist review.

Authors:  David N Blane; Sara Macdonald; Catherine A O'Donnell
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2019-12-22       Impact factor: 9.213

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.