BACKGROUND: In some patients, transfemoral, transaxillary, or transapical aortic valve implantation is not possible. Thus, carotid artery access may represent a safe alternative to those accesses, and even offers certain advantages. In this article, we describe aortic valve implantation using the left carotid arterial approach and report our initial experience. METHODS: Using a self-expandable nitinol based device (CoreValve ReValving system, Medtronic Ltd, Luxembourg), we exposed the left carotid artery through a small incision. Arterial puncture and initial 6F sheath introduction were achieved through a contraincision. The same implantation technique as for transaxillary implantation was used. Progressive artery dilatation was achieved using sheaths of increasing diameter. Rapid ventricular pacing was used to reduce cardiac output while performing a routine aortic balloon valvuloplasty. Only then, an 18F sheath was inserted into the carotid artery and pushed down into the ascending aorta. The patients were monitored using cerebral oxymetry to assess cerebral perfusion. RESULTS: Twelve consecutive patients, at high surgical risk, were implanted and studied prospectively. Transfemoral and subclavian catheterization were considered unfeasible or at risk of severe complications. Carotid arterial injury did not occur in any patient. A transient ischemic attack occurred in 1 patient, contralateral to the carotid access. There were no deaths in either intraprocedural or during the 30-day follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: This initial experience suggests that left carotid transarterial aortic valve implantation, in selected high-risk patients, is feasible and safe with satisfactory short-term outcomes.
BACKGROUND: In some patients, transfemoral, transaxillary, or transapical aortic valve implantation is not possible. Thus, carotid artery access may represent a safe alternative to those accesses, and even offers certain advantages. In this article, we describe aortic valve implantation using the left carotid arterial approach and report our initial experience. METHODS: Using a self-expandable nitinol based device (CoreValve ReValving system, Medtronic Ltd, Luxembourg), we exposed the left carotid artery through a small incision. Arterial puncture and initial 6F sheath introduction were achieved through a contraincision. The same implantation technique as for transaxillary implantation was used. Progressive artery dilatation was achieved using sheaths of increasing diameter. Rapid ventricular pacing was used to reduce cardiac output while performing a routine aortic balloon valvuloplasty. Only then, an 18F sheath was inserted into the carotid artery and pushed down into the ascending aorta. The patients were monitored using cerebral oxymetry to assess cerebral perfusion. RESULTS: Twelve consecutive patients, at high surgical risk, were implanted and studied prospectively. Transfemoral and subclavian catheterization were considered unfeasible or at risk of severe complications. Carotid arterial injury did not occur in any patient. A transient ischemic attack occurred in 1 patient, contralateral to the carotid access. There were no deaths in either intraprocedural or during the 30-day follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: This initial experience suggests that left carotid transarterial aortic valve implantation, in selected high-risk patients, is feasible and safe with satisfactory short-term outcomes.
Authors: Jayendrakumar S Patel; Amar Krishnaswamy; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; Stephanie Mick; Samir R Kapadia Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: Saverio Muscoli; Valeria Cammalleri; Michela Bonanni; Francesca Romana Prandi; Angela Sanseviero; Gianluca Massaro; Marco Di Luozzo; Marcello Chiocchi; Andrea Ascoli Marchetti; Arnaldo Ippoliti; Alessia Zingaro; Gian Paolo Ussia; Francesco Romeo; Pasquale De Vico Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-16 Impact factor: 4.614