Literature DB >> 22463910

Surgical management of late sequelae in survivors of an episode of acute necrotizing pancreatitis.

William C Beck1, Manoop S Bhutani, Gottumukkala S Raju, William H Nealon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After surviving an episode of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP), a variety of late sequelae develop and require nonoperative or operative interventions. Persistent pancreatic fistula, fluid collections, recurrent pancreatitis, sepsis, pain, and intolerance of po intake are seen. STUDY
DESIGN: We have maintained records for all patients hospitalized from 1993 through 2010 with a diagnosis of ANP. Once discharged from hospital, patients were managed with routine clinic follow-up at close intervals and later at 6-month intervals. Using ERCP or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, all patients' pancreatic ducts were classified as type I (normal), type II (stricture), or type III (disconnected). Patients were monitored for the complications mentioned. Operations performed >8 weeks after the initial episode of ANP were defined as late and evaluated for operative mortality, morbidity, success in resolving symptoms/collections, and length of stay.
RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-seven patients with ANP were included. Seventy-one late operations were performed (59 drainage procedures/12 resections). Operative mortality was 1%, morbidity was 19%, and mean length of stay was 6.3 ± 5.6 days. Poor po intake was seen in 80% of operated patients and total parenteral nutrition dependence in 42%. Duct type correlated with pancreatic debridement, persistent fluid collection/fistula, pain, po intake intolerance, and late operation. Late operation successfully resolved symptoms and/or fluid collections in 96%. Recurrent pancreatitis was improved in 87% and eliminated in 78%.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who require late operation after surviving an episode of ANP are more likely to have sustained ductal injuries and are likely to require operation for either pain or for inability to tolerate po intake. Operation can be performed safely with a low mortality.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22463910     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.12.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Interventions for pancreatitis].

Authors:  K Dubasz; M Misbahuddin; C Graeb; B Radeleff
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Walled-off necrosis: safety of watchful waiting.

Authors:  Marek Wroński; Włodzimierz Cebulski; Waldemar Pawłowski; Ireneusz W Krasnodębski; Maciej Słodkowski
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Various Modalities Accurate in Diagnosing a Disrupted or Disconnected Pancreatic Duct in Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hester C Timmerhuis; Sven M van Dijk; Robert C Verdonk; Thomas L Bollen; Marco J Bruno; Paul Fockens; Jeanin E van Hooft; Rogier P Voermans; Marc G Besselink; Hjalmar C van Santvoort
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Minimally Invasive Necrosectomy Techniques in Severe Acute Pancreatitis: Role of Percutaneous Necrosectomy and Video-Assisted Retroperitoneal Debridement.

Authors:  Jennifer A Logue; C Ross Carter
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 5.  Together We Stand, Divided We Fall: A Multidisciplinary Approach in Complicated Acute Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Jorge Paulino; Gonçalo Ramos; Filipe Veloso Gomes
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.