Literature DB >> 22463735

Behavioural responses of Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto M and S molecular form larvae to an aquatic predator in Burkina Faso.

Geoffrey Gimonneau1, Marco Pombi, Roch K Dabiré, Abdoulaye Diabaté, Serge Morand, Frédéric Simard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Predation of aquatic immature stages has been identified as a major evolutionary force driving habitat segregation and niche partitioning in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto in the humid savannahs of Burkina Faso, West Africa. Here, we explored behavioural responses to the presence of a predator in wild populations of the M and S molecular forms of An. gambiae that typically breed in permanent (e.g., rice field paddies) and temporary (e.g., road ruts) water collections.
METHODS: Larvae used in these experiments were obtained from eggs laid by wild female An. gambiae collected from two localities in south-western Burkina Faso during the 2008 rainy season. Single larvae were observed in an experimental arena, and behavioural traits were recorded and quantified a) in the absence of a predator and b) in the presence of a widespread mosquito predator, the backswimmer Anisops jaczewskii. Differences in the proportion of time allocated to each behaviour were assessed using Principal Component Analysis and Multivariate Analysis of Variance.
RESULTS: The behaviour of M and S form larvae was found to differ significantly; although both forms mainly foraged at the water surface, spending 60-90% of their time filtering water at the surface or along the wall of the container, M form larvae spent on average significantly more time browsing at the bottom of the container than S form larvae (4.5 vs. 1.3% of their overall time, respectively; P < 0.05). In the presence of a predator, larvae of both forms modified their behaviour, spending significantly more time resting along the container wall (P < 0.001). This change in behaviour was at least twice as great in the M form (from 38.6 to 66.6% of the time at the wall in the absence and presence of the predator, respectively) than in the S form (from 48.3 to 64.1%). Thrashing at the water surface exposed larvae to a significantly greater risk of predation by the notonectid (P < 0.01), whereas predation occurred significantly less often when larvae were at the container wall (P < 0.05) and might reflect predator vigilance.
CONCLUSIONS: Behavioural differences between larvae of the M and S form of An. gambiae in response to an acute predation risk is likely to be a reflection of different trade-offs between foraging and predator vigilance that might be of adaptive value in contrasting aquatic ecosystems. Future studies should explore the relevance of these findings under the wide range of natural settings where both forms co-exist in Africa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22463735      PMCID: PMC3352179          DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasit Vectors        ISSN: 1756-3305            Impact factor:   3.876


  26 in total

1.  Phenotypic lability and the evolution of predator-induced plasticity in tadpoles.

Authors:  J Van Buskirk
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Mass rearing and egg release of Buenoa scimitra Bare as biocontrol of larval Culex quinquefasciatus.

Authors:  V A Rodríguez-Castro; H Quiroz-Martinez; C Solis-Rojas; L O Tejada
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 0.917

3.  Genetic association of physically unlinked islands of genomic divergence in incipient species of Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Bradley J White; Changde Cheng; Frederic Simard; Carlo Costantini; Nora J Besansky
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Larval habitat segregation between the molecular forms of the mosquito Anopheles gambiae in a rice field area of Burkina Faso, West Africa.

Authors:  G Gimonneau; M Pombi; M Choisy; S Morand; R K Dabiré; F Simard
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 2.739

5.  The role of agricultural use of insecticides in resistance to pyrethroids in Anopheles gambiae s.l. in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Abdoulaye Diabate; Thierry Baldet; Fabrice Chandre; Martin Akoobeto; T Robert Guiguemde; Frédéric Darriet; Cécile Brengues; Pierre Guillet; Janet Hemingway; Graham J Small; Jean Marc Hougard
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.345

6.  [Malaria transmission in 1999 in the rice field area of the Kou Valley (Bama), (Burkina Faso)].

Authors:  Thierry Baldet; Abdoutaye Diabaté; Tinga Robert Guiguemdé
Journal:  Sante       Date:  2003 Jan-Mar

7.  Distribution of insensitive acetylcholinesterase (ace-1R) in Anopheles gambiae s.l. populations from Burkina Faso (West Africa).

Authors:  K R Dabiré; A Diabaté; M Namontougou; L Djogbenou; P Kengne; F Simard; C Bass; T Baldet
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  Morphological differentiation may mediate mate-choice between incipient species of Anopheles gambiae s.s.

Authors:  Michelle R Sanford; Berna Demirci; Clare D Marsden; Yoosook Lee; Anthony J Cornel; Gregory C Lanzaro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Insertion polymorphisms of SINE200 retrotransposons within speciation islands of Anopheles gambiae molecular forms.

Authors:  Federica Santolamazza; Emiliano Mancini; Frédéric Simard; Yumin Qi; Zhijian Tu; Alessandra della Torre
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 2.979

10.  Living at the edge: biogeographic patterns of habitat segregation conform to speciation by niche expansion in Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Carlo Costantini; Diego Ayala; Wamdaogo M Guelbeogo; Marco Pombi; Corentin Y Some; Imael Hn Bassole; Kenji Ose; Jean-Marie Fotsing; N'Falé Sagnon; Didier Fontenille; Nora J Besansky; Frédéric Simard
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 2.964

View more
  26 in total

1.  Gene expression divergence between malaria vector sibling species Anopheles gambiae and An. coluzzii from rural and urban Yaoundé Cameroon.

Authors:  Bryan J Cassone; Colince Kamdem; Changde Cheng; John C Tan; Matthew W Hahn; Carlo Costantini; Nora J Besansky
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Improvement of water quality for mass anopheline rearing: evaluation of the impact of ammonia-capturing zeolite on larval development and adult phenotypic quality.

Authors:  Nwamaka Oluchukwu Akpodiete; Frédéric Tripet
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.876

3.  Perfect association between spatial swarm segregation and the X-chromosome speciation island in hybridizing Anopheles coluzzii and Anopheles gambiae populations.

Authors:  Abdoulaye Niang; Hamidou Maïga; Simon P Sawadogo; Lassana Konaté; Ousmane Faye; Yoosook Lee; Roch K Dabiré; Abdoulaye Diabaté; Frederic Tripet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Larval competition between An. coluzzii and An. gambiae in insectary and semi-field conditions in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Geoffrey Gimonneau; Lou Brossette; Wadaka Mamaï; Roch K Dabiré; Frédéric Simard
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.112

5.  Evidence for carry-over effects of predator exposure on pathogen transmission potential.

Authors:  Olivier Roux; Amélie Vantaux; Benjamin Roche; Koudraogo B Yameogo; Kounbobr R Dabiré; Abdoulaye Diabaté; Frederic Simard; Thierry Lefèvre
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Abiotic and biotic factors associated with the presence of Anopheles arabiensis immatures and their abundance in naturally occurring and man-made aquatic habitats.

Authors:  Louis Clément Gouagna; Manpionona Rakotondranary; Sebastien Boyer; Guy Lempérière; Jean-Sébastien Dehecq; Didier Fontenille
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Evidence for population-specific positive selection on immune genes of Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Jacob E Crawford; Emmanuel Bischoff; Thierry Garnier; Awa Gneme; Karin Eiglmeier; Inge Holm; Michelle M Riehle; Wamdaogo M Guelbeogo; N'Fale Sagnon; Brian P Lazzaro; Kenneth D Vernick
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Patterns of genomic differentiation between ecologically differentiated M and S forms of Anopheles gambiae in West and Central Africa.

Authors:  Kyanne R Reidenbach; Daniel E Neafsey; Carlo Costantini; N'fale Sagnon; Frédéric Simard; Gregory J Ragland; Scott P Egan; Jeffrey L Feder; Marc A T Muskavitch; Nora J Besansky
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Modelling the risk of being bitten by malaria vectors in a vector control area in southern Benin, west Africa.

Authors:  Nicolas Moiroux; Abdul S Bio-Bangana; Armel Djènontin; Fabrice Chandre; Vincent Corbel; Hélène Guis
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Identification of cryptic Anopheles mosquito species by molecular protein profiling.

Authors:  Pie Müller; Valentin Pflüger; Matthias Wittwer; Dominik Ziegler; Fabrice Chandre; Frédéric Simard; Christian Lengeler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.