Literature DB >> 22463616

Healthcare resource use in advanced prostate cancer patients treated with docetaxel.

Maneesha Mehra1, Ying Wu, Ravinder Dhawan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although the treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has improved with newer therapies, there is little understanding how these therapies have impacted resource use and associated expenditures; available estimates are dated. The current study examined contemporary healthcare utilization and associated costs for mCRPC patients and how these measures changed over time.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis used medical and pharmaceutical insurance claims data from a large non-payer-owned integrated claims database of US commercial insurers. Amongst all patients with a prostate cancer diagnosis (n=256,464), those with ≥ 1 docetaxel claim (docetaxel cohort, n=3642) were identified as mCRPC patients. Within the docetaxel cohort, an additional 6-months follow-up cohort (n=2862) was identified, i.e., patients with at least 6 months of follow-up after the first docetaxel claim. Resource utilization and costs were identified for all-cause hospitalizations, emergency room (ER) visits, physician visits and ambulatory visits, and prostate cancer-related prescription treatments.
RESULTS: Significant increases in the mean per-patient-per-month (PPPM) count for the docetaxel cohort were observed for all medical resources measured (hospitalizations and ER, physician, and ambulatory visits) in the post-docetaxel period compared with the pre-docetaxel period (p<0.0001); similar significant increases were observed for the 6-months follow-up cohort in the last 6 months (prior to lost to follow-up date) compared with the period preceding the last 6 months (p<0.0408 ambulatory visits, p<0.0001 all other resources). Total docetaxel cohort costs (mean [standard deviation]) rose from an average PPPM cost of US$2593 (3208) in the pre-docetaxel period to US$5847 (6990) in the post-docetaxel period (p<0.0001); each of the individual resources measured (hospitalization, all healthcare visits, and prescription costs) demonstrated significant increases (p<0.0001). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study design.
CONCLUSIONS: This large database analysis showed a significant increase in use of healthcare resources and associated costs among mCRPC patients following first-line docetaxel treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22463616     DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2012.681718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Econ        ISSN: 1369-6998            Impact factor:   2.448


  4 in total

Review 1.  Treatments for Metastatic Prostate Cancer (mPC): A Review of Costing Evidence.

Authors:  Jan Norum; Carsten Nieder
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Drug costs in the management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in Canada.

Authors:  Alice Dragomir; Daniela Dinea; Marie Vanhuyse; Fabio L Cury; Armen G Aprikian
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Cost-effectiveness analyses and cost analyses in castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Grochtdreis; Hans-Helmut König; Alexander Dobruschkin; Gunhild von Amsberg; Judith Dams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Methodological approaches to measuring the incidence of unplanned emergency department presentations by cancer patients receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  P H Dufton; M F Gerdtz; R Jarden; M Krishnasamy
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.615

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.