Literature DB >> 22462848

Optimal pairwise and non-pairwise alchemical pathways for free energy calculations of molecular transformation in solution phase.

Tri T Pham1, Michael R Shirts.   

Abstract

We estimate the global minimum variance path for computing the free energy insertion into or deletion of small molecules from a dense fluid. We perform this optimization over all pair potentials, irrespective of functional form, using functional optimization with a two-body approximation for the radial distribution function. Surprisingly, the optimal pairwise path obtained via this method is almost identical to the path obtained using a optimized generalized "soft core" potential reported by Pham and Shirts [J. Chem. Phys. 135, 034114 (2011)]. We also derive the lowest variance non-pairwise potential path for molecular insertion or deletion and compare its efficiency to the pairwise path. Under certain conditions, non-pairwise pathways can reduce the total variance by up to 60% compared to optimal pairwise pathways. However, optimal non-pairwise pathways do not appear generally feasible for practical free energy calculations because an accurate estimate of the free energy, the parameter that is itself is desired, is required for constructing this non-pairwise path. Additionally, simulations at most intermediate states of these non-pairwise paths have significantly longer correlation times, often exceeding standard simulation lengths for solvation of bulky molecules. The findings suggest that the previously obtained soft core pathway is the lowest variance pathway for molecular insertion or deletion in practice. The findings also demonstrate the utility of functional optimization for determining the efficiency of thermodynamic processes performed with molecular simulation.

Year:  2012        PMID: 22462848     DOI: 10.1063/1.3697833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  7 in total

1.  The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Travis Jensen; David R Slochower; Matteo Aldeghi; Vytautas Gapsys; Dimitris Ntekoumes; Stefano Bosisio; Michail Papadourakis; Niel M Henriksen; Bert L de Groot; Zoe Cournia; Alex Dickson; Julien Michel; Michael K Gilson; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Estimating thermodynamic expectations and free energies in expanded ensemble simulations: Systematic variance reduction through conditioning.

Authors:  Manuel Athènes; Pierre Terrier
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2017-05-21       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Approaches for calculating solvation free energies and enthalpies demonstrated with an update of the FreeSolv database.

Authors:  Guilherme Duarte Ramos Matos; Daisy Y Kyu; Hannes H Loeffler; John D Chodera; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Eng Data       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.694

4.  Reversibly Sampling Conformations and Binding Modes Using Molecular Darting.

Authors:  Samuel C Gill; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Free-energy calculations of residue mutations in a tripeptide using various methods to overcome inefficient sampling.

Authors:  Michael M H Graf; Manuela Maurer; Chris Oostenbrink
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  Calculation of Relative Binding Free Energy in the Water-Filled Active Site of Oligopeptide-Binding Protein A.

Authors:  Manuela Maurer; Stephanie B A de Beer; Chris Oostenbrink
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Comparison of free-energy methods using a tripeptide-water model system.

Authors:  Manuela Maurer; Niels Hansen; Chris Oostenbrink
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.672

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.