STUDY OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of genotype-guided selection of antiplatelet therapy compared with selecting clopidogrel or prasugrel irrespective of genotype. DESIGN: Decision model based on event occurrence in the Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition with Prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TRITON-TIMI) 38. PATIENTS: Simulated cohort of patients with acute coronary syndrome scheduled to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), consisting of three arms: those receiving genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel or prasugrel, those receiving clopidogrel regardless of genotype, and those receiving prasugrel regardless of genotype. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All three arms of the model incorporated the probability that patients would experience a cardiovascular event (death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke), a bleeding event (major or minor bleeding), or no event while receiving antiplatelet therapy during the 15 months after the scheduled PCI. The cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 genotype determined antiplatelet drug selection in the genotyping group. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for each event avoided in the genotype-guided therapy arm versus the other two arms. Genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy was dominant, or more effective and less costly, when compared with the selection of clopidogrel (ICER -$6760 [95% confidence interval (CI) -$6720 to -$6790]) or prasugrel (ICER -$11,710 [95% CI -$11,480 to -$11,950]) for all patients without regard to genotype. Genotype-guided therapy that included generic clopidogrel was dominant to prasugrel for all patients (ICER -$27,160 [95% CI -$27,890 to -$26,420]). Cost savings were not evident when genotype-guided therapy that included generic clopidogrel was compared with generic clopidogrel for all patients (ICER $2300 [95% CI $2290 to $2320]). [Correction added after online publication 12-Mar-2012: In the previous sentence -$2300 has been corrected as $2300.]. CONCLUSION: Genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy selection may be more cost-effective and may provide more clinical value due to fewer adverse outcomes.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of genotype-guided selection of antiplatelet therapy compared with selecting clopidogrel or prasugrel irrespective of genotype. DESIGN: Decision model based on event occurrence in the Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition with Prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TRITON-TIMI) 38. PATIENTS: Simulated cohort of patients with acute coronary syndrome scheduled to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), consisting of three arms: those receiving genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel or prasugrel, those receiving clopidogrel regardless of genotype, and those receiving prasugrel regardless of genotype. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All three arms of the model incorporated the probability that patients would experience a cardiovascular event (death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke), a bleeding event (major or minor bleeding), or no event while receiving antiplatelet therapy during the 15 months after the scheduled PCI. The cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 genotype determined antiplatelet drug selection in the genotyping group. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for each event avoided in the genotype-guided therapy arm versus the other two arms. Genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy was dominant, or more effective and less costly, when compared with the selection of clopidogrel (ICER -$6760 [95% confidence interval (CI) -$6720 to -$6790]) or prasugrel (ICER -$11,710 [95% CI -$11,480 to -$11,950]) for all patients without regard to genotype. Genotype-guided therapy that included generic clopidogrel was dominant to prasugrel for all patients (ICER -$27,160 [95% CI -$27,890 to -$26,420]). Cost savings were not evident when genotype-guided therapy that included generic clopidogrel was compared with generic clopidogrel for all patients (ICER $2300 [95% CI $2290 to $2320]). [Correction added after online publication 12-Mar-2012: In the previous sentence -$2300 has been corrected as $2300.]. CONCLUSION: Genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy selection may be more cost-effective and may provide more clinical value due to fewer adverse outcomes.
Authors: David R Holmes; Gregory J Dehmer; Sanjay Kaul; Dana Leifer; Patrick T O'Gara; C Michael Stein Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-07-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: J Greenhalgh; A Bagust; A Boland; C M Saborido; N Fleeman; C McLeod; Y Dundar; R Dickson; C Proudlove; R Kolamunnage-Dona; M Fisher Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Jessica L Mega; Tabassome Simon; Jean-Philippe Collet; Jeffrey L Anderson; Elliott M Antman; Kevin Bliden; Christopher P Cannon; Nicolas Danchin; Betti Giusti; Paul Gurbel; Benjamin D Horne; Jean-Sebastian Hulot; Adnan Kastrati; Gilles Montalescot; Franz-Josef Neumann; Lei Shen; Dirk Sibbing; P Gabriel Steg; Dietmar Trenk; Stephen D Wiviott; Marc S Sabatine Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-10-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Edward F Ewen; Liping Zhao; Paul Kolm; Claudine Jurkovitz; Dogan Fidan; Harvey D White; Richard Gallo; William S Weintraub Journal: J Interv Cardiol Date: 2009-02-26 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Yuri B Pride; Stephen D Wiviott; Jacqueline L Buros; Cafer Zorkun; M Umer Tariq; Elliott M Antman; Eugene Braunwald; C Michael Gibson Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Alan R Shuldiner; Jeffrey R O'Connell; Kevin P Bliden; Amish Gandhi; Kathleen Ryan; Richard B Horenstein; Coleen M Damcott; Ruth Pakyz; Udaya S Tantry; Quince Gibson; Toni I Pollin; Wendy Post; Afshin Parsa; Braxton D Mitchell; Nauder Faraday; William Herzog; Paul A Gurbel Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-08-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Alan R Shuldiner; Kathleen Palmer; Ruth E Pakyz; Tameka D Alestock; Kristin A Maloney; Courtney O'Neill; Shaun Bhatty; Jamie Schub; Casey Lynnette Overby; Richard B Horenstein; Toni I Pollin; Mark D Kelemen; Amber L Beitelshees; Shawn W Robinson; Miriam G Blitzer; Patrick F McArdle; Lawrence Brown; Linda Jo Bone Jeng; Richard Y Zhao; Nicholas Ambulos; Mark R Vesely Journal: Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 3.908
Authors: Kristin W Weitzel; Amanda R Elsey; Taimour Y Langaee; Benjamin Burkley; David R Nessl; Aniwaa Owusu Obeng; Benjamin J Staley; Hui-Jia Dong; Robert W Allan; J Felix Liu; Rhonda M Cooper-Dehoff; R David Anderson; Michael Conlon; Michael J Clare-Salzler; David R Nelson; Julie A Johnson Journal: Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 3.908
Authors: Francesca Wirth; Graziella Zahra; Robert G Xuereb; Christopher Barbara; Albert Fenech; Lilian M Azzopardi Journal: Int J Clin Pharm Date: 2016-03-15
Authors: Aniwaa Owusu Obeng; Eric F Egelund; Abdullah Alsultan; Charles A Peloquin; Julie A Johnson Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2014-02-07 Impact factor: 4.705