Literature DB >> 22460921

Postoperative trunk shift in Lenke 1C scoliosis: what causes it? How can it be prevented?

Yu Wang1, Cody Eric Bünger, Chunsen Wu, Yanqun Zhang, Ebbe Stender Hansen.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A risk factor analysis study.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the causative factors for postoperative trunk shift in Lenke 1C scoliosis and investigate how to prevent it. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: When selective thoracic fusion is performed, postoperative trunk shift is a significant problem in the management of Lenke 1C scoliosis. It is often accompanied by unsatisfactory clinical outcomes and a risk of reoperation.
METHODS: We reviewed all the patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgically treated in our institution from 2002 through 2008. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with Lenke 1C curves who were treated with selective thoracic fusion using posterior pedicle screw-only constructs; (2) the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) ending at L1 level or above; and (3) 2-year radiographical follow-up. Eighteen radiographical parameters were chosen as potential risk factors. The 18 parameters measured (1) amount of correction obtained by surgery; (2) preoperative position of LIV; (3) magnitude of major thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar (MT and TL/L) curves and ratio of MT: TL/L curve; and (4) curve flexibility. Both comparative and correlation analyses were performed. Those parameters that had shown highest correlation with the 2-year thoracic apical vertebra-center sacral vertical line (AV-CSVL) distance were selected to form a linear regression model, by which the correlations were quantified.
RESULTS: Of the 278 patients reviewed, 44 met the inclusion criteria. The parameters that measured the preoperative position of LIV and ratio of MT: TL/L curve showed high correlation with the 2-year thoracic AV-CSVL distance. With regard to the parameters that measured the amount of correction obtained by surgery, only the correction of the thoracic AV-T1 distance showed low correlation. Among the 18 parameters, preoperative lowest instrumented vertebra-lower end vertebra (LIV-LEV) difference and ratio of MT: TL/L Cobb angle were selected to form a formula to help predict postoperative trunk shift. The formula was as follows: 2-year thoracic AV-CSVL distance = -26.6 + 22.7 (ratio of MT: TL/L Cobb angle) - 3.9 (preoperative LIV-LEV difference). The model R2 = 0.55.
CONCLUSION: Both LIV selection and ratio of MT: TL/L curve were found to be highly correlated with the onset of postoperative trunk shift in Lenke 1C scoliosis. Amount of correction obtained by surgery, however, did not seem to be an independent causative factor. Postoperative trunk shift is less likely to occur when selecting LEV as LIV and the ratio of MT: TL/L Cobb angle of 1.2° or more.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22460921     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318255a053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  10 in total

Review 1.  Classifications in Brief: The Lenke Classification for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Casey Slattery; Kushagra Verma
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Do postoperative radiographically verified technical success, improved cosmesis, and trunk shift corroborate with patient-reported outcomes in Lenke 1C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Authors:  Shallu Sharma; Cody Eric Bünger; Thomas Andersen; Haolin Sun; Chunsen Wu; Ebbe Stender Hansen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The Surgical Overcorrection of Lenke Type 1 Deformities with Selective Fusion Segments: What Happens to the Coronal Balance?

Authors:  Yunus Atici; Sinan Erdogan; Yunus Emre Akman; Murat Mert; Engin Carkci; Tolga Tuzuner
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2016-09-30

4.  Clinical photography in severe idiopathic scoliosis candidate for surgery: is it a useful tool to differentiate among Lenke patterns?

Authors:  Juan Bago; Javier Pizones; Antonia Matamalas; Elisa D'Agata
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Defining risk factors for adding-on in Lenke 1 and 2 AR curves.

Authors:  Brendon C Mitchell; David L Skaggs; Lawrence G Lenke; Tracey P Bastrom; Carrie E Bartley; Peter O Newton
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-07-03

6.  Natural History of Postoperative Adding-On in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: What Are the Risk Factors for Progressive Adding-On?

Authors:  Xiaodong Qin; Chao Xia; Leilei Xu; Fei Sheng; Huang Yan; Yong Qiu; Zezhang Zhu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Selective Thoracic Fusion for King-Moe Type II/Lenke 1C Curve in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comprehensive Review of Major Concerns.

Authors:  Masayuki Ishikawa; Makoto Nishiyama; Michihiro Kamata
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-10-10

8.  Onset and remodeling of coronal imbalance after selective posterior thoracic fusion for Lenke 1C and 2C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (a pilot study).

Authors:  Masayuki Ishikawa; Kai Cao; Long Pang; Nobuyuki Fujita; Mitsuru Yagi; Naobumi Hosogane; Takashi Tsuji; Masafumi Machida; Shinichi Ishihara; Makoto Nishiyama; Yasuyuki Fukui; Masaya Nakamura; Morio Matsumoto; Kota Watanabe
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2017-05-12

9.  Data-driven Classification of the 3D Spinal Curve in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with an Applications in Surgical Outcome Prediction.

Authors:  Saba Pasha; John Flynn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Effect of Preoperative SpineCor® Treatment on Surgical Outcome in Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Karina Rożek; Barbara Jasiewicz
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-01-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.