Literature DB >> 22459856

Accuracy of genomic predictions of residual feed intake and 250-day body weight in growing heifers using 625,000 single nucleotide polymorphism markers.

J E Pryce1, J Arias, P J Bowman, S R Davis, K A Macdonald, G C Waghorn, W J Wales, Y J Williams, R J Spelman, B J Hayes.   

Abstract

Feed makes up a large proportion of variable costs in dairying. For this reason, selection for traits associated with feed conversion efficiency should lead to greater profitability of dairying. Residual feed intake (RFI) is the difference between actual and predicted feed intakes and is a useful selection criterion for greater feed efficiency. However, measuring individual feed intakes on a large scale is prohibitively expensive. A panel of DNA markers explaining genetic variation in this trait would enable cost-effective genomic selection for this trait. With the aim of enabling genomic selection for RFI, we used data from almost 2,000 heifers measured for growth rate and feed intake in Australia (AU) and New Zealand (NZ) genotyped for 625,000 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers. Substantial variation in RFI and 250-d body weight (BW250) was demonstrated. Heritabilities of RFI and BW250 estimated using genomic relationships among the heifers were 0.22 and 0.28 in AU heifers and 0.38 and 0.44 in NZ heifers, respectively. Genomic breeding values for RFI and BW250 were derived using genomic BLUP and 2 bayesian methods (BayesA, BayesMulti). The accuracies of genomic breeding values for RFI were evaluated using cross-validation. When 624,930 SNP were used to derive the prediction equation, the accuracies averaged 0.37 and 0.31 for RFI in AU and NZ validation data sets, respectively, and 0.40 and 0.25 for BW250 in AU and NZ, respectively. The greatest advantage of using the full 624,930 SNP over a reduced panel of 36,673 SNP (the widely used BovineSNP50 array) was when the reference population included only animals from either the AU or the NZ experiment. Finally, the bayesian methods were also used for quantitative trait loci detection. On chromosome 14 at around 25 Mb, several SNP closest to PLAG1 (a gene believed to affect stature in humans and cattle) had an effect on BW250 in both AU and NZ populations. In addition, 8 SNP with large effects on RFI were located on chromosome 14 at around 35.7 Mb. These SNP may be associated with the gene NCOA2, which has a role in controlling energy metabolism.
Copyright © 2012 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22459856     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  30 in total

Review 1.  Genomic prediction in animals and plants: simulation of data, validation, reporting, and benchmarking.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Mario P L Calus; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Gustavo de Los Campos; John M Hickey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The effect of linkage disequilibrium and family relationships on the reliability of genomic prediction.

Authors:  Yvonne C J Wientjes; Roel F Veerkamp; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The effects of demography and long-term selection on the accuracy of genomic prediction with sequence data.

Authors:  Iona M MacLeod; Ben J Hayes; Michael E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Gene expression analysis of blood, liver, and muscle in cattle divergently selected for high and low residual feed intake.

Authors:  M Khansefid; C A Millen; Y Chen; J E Pryce; A J Chamberlain; C J Vander Jagt; C Gondro; M E Goddard
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Accuracy of pedigree and genomic predictions of carcass and novel meat quality traits in multi-breed sheep data assessed by cross-validation.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Andrew A Swan; Julius H J van der Werf; Ben J Hayes
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Metagenomic predictions: from microbiome to complex health and environmental phenotypes in humans and cattle.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Ross; Peter J Moate; Leah C Marett; Ben G Cocks; Ben J Hayes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A computationally efficient algorithm for genomic prediction using a Bayesian model.

Authors:  Tingting Wang; Yi-Ping Phoebe Chen; Michael E Goddard; Theo H E Meuwissen; Kathryn E Kemper; Ben J Hayes
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  Characterizing homozygosity across United States, New Zealand and Australian Jersey cow and bull populations.

Authors:  Jeremy T Howard; Christian Maltecca; Mekonnen Haile-Mariam; Ben J Hayes; Jennie E Pryce
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Genetic analysis of egg production traits in turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) using a single-step genomic random regression model.

Authors:  Hakimeh Emamgholi Begli; Lawrence R Schaeffer; Emhimad Abdalla; Emmanuel A Lozada-Soto; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek; Benjamin J Wood; Christine F Baes
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Imputation of high-density genotypes in the Fleckvieh cattle population.

Authors:  Hubert Pausch; Bernhard Aigner; Reiner Emmerling; Christian Edel; Kay-Uwe Götz; Ruedi Fries
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.