Literature DB >> 22459661

The learning curve, accuracy, and interobserver agreement of endoscope-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for the differentiation of colorectal lesions.

Teaco Kuiper1, Ralf Kiesslich, Cyriel Ponsioen, Paul Fockens, Evelien Dekker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The endoscope-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (eCLE) system allows in vivo imaging of colorectal epithelium. Little is known about the learning curve for accurate interpretation of confocal images acquired with eCLE.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the learning curve of eCLE, its diagnostic accuracy, and the intra- and interobserver agreement for the differentiation of colorectal lesions.
DESIGN: Post hoc assessment of selected eCLE images.
SETTING: Academic centers. PATIENTS: This study involved colonoscopic images from 47 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Learning curve of eCLE, accuracy, and intraobserver and interobserver agreement.
METHODS: Three endoscopists received a short introduction to eCLE before evaluating 90 images. Observers assessed all eCLE images by using the Mainz classification. After each set of 30 images, the accuracy of each observer was assessed. The same procedure was repeated 6 months later by using the same set of images. LIMITATIONS: Post hoc assessment.
RESULTS: There were no significant changes between the first set of 30 images and the 2 consecutive sets (P = .08 and P = .180, respectively). The overall accuracy was 85.6%, 95.6%, and 92.2% for each observer. The κ values of the intraobserver agreement were 0.68, 0.84, and 0.77 for each observer. The κ value for interobserver agreement was 0.73 during the first and 0.72 during the second assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: Accurate post hoc interpretation of eCLE confocal images can be learned quickly. High diagnostic accuracy was achieved by all 3 observers during the initial stage of the assessment, which remained high thereafter. Intra- and interobserver agreement was substantial for all 3 observers. Future studies should focus on the real-time assessment of eCLE images.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22459661     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  19 in total

1.  In vivo classification of colorectal neoplasia using high-resolution microendoscopy: Improvement with experience.

Authors:  Neil D Parikh; Daniel Perl; Michelle H Lee; Shannon S Chang; Alexandros D Polydorides; Erin Moshier; James Godbold; Elinor Zhou; Josephine Mitcham; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Sharmila Anandasabapathy
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.029

2.  Optical biopsy in gastroenterology: Focus on confocal laser endomicroscopy.

Authors:  Zaheer Nabi; D Nageshwar Reddy
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-10-02

3.  SAGES TAVAC safety and efficacy analysis confocal laser endomicroscopy.

Authors:  Mazen R Al-Mansour; Antonio Caycedo-Marulanda; Brian R Davis; Abdulrahim Alawashez; Salvatore Docimo; Alia Qureshi; Shawn Tsuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  High-resolution microendoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Justin S Louie; Richa Shukla; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Sharmila Anandasabapathy
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.043

Review 5.  Role of new endoscopic techniques in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Jasmijn F Haanstra; Jan H Kleibeuker; Jan J Koornstra
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  In vivo diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution microendoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps: a prospective study.

Authors:  Neil D Parikh; Daniel Perl; Michelle H Lee; Brijen Shah; Yuki Young; Shannon S Chang; Richa Shukla; Alexandros D Polydorides; Erin Moshier; James Godbold; Elinor Zhou; Josephine Mitcham; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Sharmila Anandasabapathy
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Confocal laser endoscopy in the diagnosis for abdominal lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Jin Huang; Yunsheng Yang; Nannan Fan; Xiuli Zhang; Shufang Wang; Jie Li; Jiangyun Meng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15

Review 8.  Confocal laser endomicroscopy of bladder and upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a new era of optical diagnosis?

Authors:  Stephanie P Chen; Joseph C Liao
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 9.  Appraisal of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in the diagnosis of pancreatic cysts.

Authors:  Somashekar G Krishna; Jeffery H Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy: prostatic and periprostatic tissues atlas and evaluation of the learning curve.

Authors:  Laura Bertoni; Stefano Puliatti; Luca Reggiani Bonetti; Antonino Maiorana; Ahmed Eissa; Paola Azzoni; Luigi Bevilacqua; Valentina Spandri; Shaniko Kaleci; Ahmed Zoeir; Maria Chiara Sighinolfi; Salvatore Micali; Giampaolo Bianchi; Giovanni Pellacani; Bernardo Rocco; Rodolfo Montironi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.