OBJECTIVE: To test the theory of a U-shaped association between time from the first presentation of symptoms in primary care to the diagnosis (the diagnostic interval) and mortality after diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Three population-based studies in Denmark and the United Kingdom using data from general practitioner's questionnaires, interviewer-administered patient questionnaires, and primary care records, respectively. RESULTS: Despite variations in the potential selection and information bias when using different methods of identifying the date of first presentation, the association between the length of the diagnostic interval and 5-year mortality rate after the diagnosis of CRC was the same for all three types of data: displaying a U-shaped association with decreasing and subsequently increasing mortality with longer diagnostic intervals. CONCLUSION: Unknown confounding and in particular confounding by indication is likely to explain the counterintuitive findings of higher mortality among patients with very short diagnostic intervals, but cannot explain the increasing mortality with longer diagnostic intervals. The results support the theory that longer diagnostic intervals cause higher mortality in patients with CRC.
OBJECTIVE: To test the theory of a U-shaped association between time from the first presentation of symptoms in primary care to the diagnosis (the diagnostic interval) and mortality after diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Three population-based studies in Denmark and the United Kingdom using data from general practitioner's questionnaires, interviewer-administered patient questionnaires, and primary care records, respectively. RESULTS: Despite variations in the potential selection and information bias when using different methods of identifying the date of first presentation, the association between the length of the diagnostic interval and 5-year mortality rate after the diagnosis of CRC was the same for all three types of data: displaying a U-shaped association with decreasing and subsequently increasing mortality with longer diagnostic intervals. CONCLUSION: Unknown confounding and in particular confounding by indication is likely to explain the counterintuitive findings of higher mortality among patients with very short diagnostic intervals, but cannot explain the increasing mortality with longer diagnostic intervals. The results support the theory that longer diagnostic intervals cause higher mortality in patients with CRC.
Authors: Colleen Webber; Marlo Whitehead; Andrea Eisen; Claire M B Holloway; Patti A Groome Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2021-01-24 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Luke H DeGraaff; Alexis J Platek; Austin J Iovoli; Kimberly E Wooten; Hassan Arshad; Vishal Gupta; Ryan P McSpadden; Moni Abraham Kuriakose; Wesley L Hicks; Mary E Platek; Anurag K Singh Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Daan Brandenbarg; Feikje Groenhof; Ilse M Siewers; Anna van der Voort; Fiona M Walter; Annette J Berendsen Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2017-12-04 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Clare Pearson; Jess Fraser; Michael Peake; Roland Valori; Veronique Poirier; Victoria H Coupland; Sara Hiom; Sean McPhail; Jodie Moffat; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; Jon Shelton Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2019-06-15 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Elizabeth A Shephard; Richard D Neal; Peter W Rose; Fiona M Walter; William T Hamilton Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Munir Ahmad Abu-Helalah; Hussam Ahmad Alshraideh; Moh'd Da'na; Mo'tasem Al-Hanaqtah; Anas Abuseif; Kamal Arqoob; Abdelrahman Ajaj Journal: J Gastrointest Cancer Date: 2016-03