Literature DB >> 22459360

State of teledermatology programs in the United States.

April W Armstrong1, Julie Wu, Carrie L Kovarik, Marc E Goldyne, Dennis H Oh, Karen C McKoy, Alison M Shippy, Hon S Pak.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Teledermatology programs in the United States have evolved over the past several decades. No systematic survey of teledermatology programs in the United States is available in peer-reviewed literature.
OBJECTIVE: To provide up-to-date information regarding the state of teledermatology programs in the United States.
METHODS: Active U.S. teledermatology programs were surveyed in 2011 with regards to practice models, clinical volume, and payment methods. These findings were compared with those from 2003.
RESULTS: By January 2012, 37 teledermatology programs were active in the United States. Store-and-forward teledermatology was the most frequent delivery modality offered by 30 (81%) of the programs. The majority of the programs were based at academic institutions (49%), followed by Veterans Administration hospitals (27%), private practice (16%), and health maintenance organizations (HMOs) (8%). The majority of programs (67%) provided services to their home state only, whereas the rest also served additional U.S. states or abroad. The median number of consultations per program was 309 (range, 5-6500) in 2011. The most frequent payer sources were private payers, followed by self-pay, Medicaid, Medicare, and HMOs. Since 2003, with the confirmed discontinuation of 24 previously active programs, the total number of active teledermatology programs in 2011 was 60% of that in 2003. However, the annual consult volume per program nearly doubled for the sustainable programs in 2011. LIMITATIONS: Itemized billing information was not uniformly available from all programs.
CONCLUSION: The turnover in teledermatology programs is relatively constant, with an increase in consult volume for sustainable programs. Store-and-forward is the dominant modality of delivery, while hybrid technology model is emerging.
Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22459360     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of Dermatologist Density Between Urban and Rural Counties in the United States.

Authors:  Hao Feng; Juliana Berk-Krauss; Paula W Feng; Jennifer A Stein
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 10.282

2.  Understanding visual search patterns of dermatologists assessing pigmented skin lesions before and after online training.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Joseph Chao; Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof; Lynne Morrison; Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Teledermatology Education: Current Use of Teledermatology in US Residency Programs.

Authors:  Karolyn A Wanat; Sabrina Newman; Kristina M Finney; Carrie L Kovarik; Ivy Lee
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2016-05

Review 4.  Racial and Ethnic Healthcare Disparities in Skin Cancer in the United States: A Review of Existing Inequities, Contributing Factors, and Potential Solutions.

Authors:  Kimberly Shao; Hao Feng
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2022-07

5.  Prospective Evaluation of a Smartphone Otoscope for Home Tympanostomy Tube Surveillance: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Debra M Don; Jeffrey A Koempel; Laurel M Fisher; Choo Phei Wee; Beth Osterbauer
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 1.547

6.  Online Care Versus In-Person Care for Improving Quality of Life in Psoriasis: A Randomized Controlled Equivalency Trial.

Authors:  April W Armstrong; Adam R Ford; Cindy J Chambers; Emanual Maverakis; Cory A Dunnick; Mary-Margaret Chren; Joel M Gelfand; Caitlin M Gibbons; Brittany M Gibbons; Christianne J Lane
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2018-11-24       Impact factor: 8.551

7.  Adoption of routine telemedicine in Norway: the current picture.

Authors:  Paolo Zanaboni; Undine Knarvik; Richard Wootton
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 8.  Recent Directions in Telemedicine: Review of Trends in Research and Practice.

Authors:  Laurence S Wilson; Anthony J Maeder
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2015-10-31

Review 9.  Two Decades of Teledermatology: Current Status and Integration in National Healthcare Systems.

Authors:  E Tensen; J P van der Heijden; M W M Jaspers; L Witkamp
Journal:  Curr Dermatol Rep       Date:  2016-03-28

10.  Uses of Mobile Device Digital Photography of Dermatologic Conditions in Primary Care.

Authors:  Jennifer L Pecina; Kirk D Wyatt; Nneka I Comfere; Matthew E Bernard; Frederick North
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.