Literature DB >> 22459235

Contraceptive choices of overweight and obese women in a publically funded hospital: possible clinical implications.

Renata Scott-Ram1, Julie Chor, Varija Bhogireddy, Louis Keith, Ashlesha Patel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the growing obesity epidemic in the United States, family planning for overweight and obese women has been understudied. The aim of this study was to describe the contraception methods selected by normal weight, overweight and obese women. STUDY
DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed 7262 charts of women who underwent first trimester surgical termination of pregnancy at the John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County between January 1, 2008, and January 1, 2010. We analyzed the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and choice of contraceptive method, after adjusting for age, race, smoking and level of education.
RESULTS: When compared to patients with BMI <25 kg/m², overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m²) and obese patients (BMI ≥30 kg/m²) were more likely to select the intrauterine device (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.28-1.32 for overweight; OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.59-1.61 for obese), contraceptive ring (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.28-1.52 for overweight; OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.57-1.63 for obese) and tubal ligation (OR 1.5 95% CI 1.44-1.62 for overweight; OR 2.9, 95% CI 2.79-3.01 for obese). They were less likely to choose injectable contraception (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.59-0.81 for overweight; OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.48-0.56 for obese). There was no relationship between BMI and choice of condoms, oral contraceptive pills and implantable methods.
CONCLUSION: In our population, the contraceptive choices of overweight and obese women differed from those of normal weight women. These differences in contraceptive selection are important to recognize in light of the potential effect of BMI on the safety and efficacy of different contraceptive methods. Further research is needed to evaluate the contraceptive preferences, risks and benefits for overweight and obese women.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22459235     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  3 in total

1.  Class III obesity and unwanted pregnancy among women with live births in New York City, 2004-2007.

Authors:  Samantha Garbers; Mary Ann Chiasson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-10

Review 2.  Women in larger bodies' experiences with contraception: a scoping review.

Authors:  Tierney M Boyce; Elena Neiterman
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.223

3.  The effect of obesity on intraoperative complication rates with hysteroscopic compared to laparoscopic sterilization: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Rachel Shepherd; Christina A Raker; Gina M Savella; Nan Du; Kristen A Matteson; Rebecca H Allen
Journal:  Contracept Reprod Med       Date:  2016-02-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.