| Literature DB >> 22458914 |
Da Guo1, Wei Xiang, Angela Seebahn, Cord-Michael Becker, Olaf Strauss.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The modulation of voltage-dependent Na+ channels by lipid metabolites such as arachidonic acid or eicosanoids plays a role in physiological functions as well as in degenerative diseases. So far TTX-resistant channels were found mainly to be regulated by lipid metabolites.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22458914 PMCID: PMC3338087 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-13-36
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurosci ISSN: 1471-2202 Impact factor: 3.288
Figure 1Effects of indomethacin and β-bungarotoxin on TTX-sensitive currents in cerebellar neurons. 1A: Example of TTX-sensitive currents: currents were activated by depolarization of cells from a holding potential of -70 mV in nine voltage-steps with 10 mV increasing amplitude and 50 ms duration; currents were measured in the presence and in the absence of TTX (10 nM). Currents measured in before application of TTX were subtracted from currents measured in the presence of TTX and used for further analysis. 1B: Effect of indomethacin (10 μM): currents were stimulated by a voltage-step from -70 mV to -10 mV and plotted as relative current to the maximal current amplitude. Indomethacin led to a faster time-dependent activation. 1C: Effect of indomethacin on TTX-sensitive Na+ currents: current density was plotted against the potentials of the electrical stimulation. Indomethcin led to increased current density. 1D: Effect of β-Bungarotoxin (β-BuTX, 10 pM) on TTX-sensitive currents. Currents were normalized to the membrane capacitance and plotted as current density against the potentials of the electrical stimulation. 1E: Inhibition of β-BuTX effects by indomethacin: currents were measured in the presence of either β-BuTX or in the presence of β-BuTX together with indomethacin; current density was calculated and plotted against the potentials of the electrical stimulation. (* p < 0.05).
Figure 2Analysis of changes in voltage-dependence of TTX-sensitive currents by indomethacin and β-bungarotoxin. 2A: Effect of β-BuTX on voltage-dependence by current/voltage-relationships: currents were normalized to the maximal current amplitude and plotted against the potentials of the electrical stimulation. Curves were fitted using the Boltzmann equation. In the presence of β-BuTX the voltage-dependent activation was shifted towards more negative potentials. 2B: Effect of indomethacin and β-BuTX on voltage-dependence by current/voltage-relationships: relative currents were plotted against the membrane potentials; curves were fitted using the Boltzmann equation. Indomethacin reversed the effect of β-BuTX. 2C: Comparison of activation thresholds from the current voltage-relationships: neither β-BuTX nor indomethacin showed any effect on activation threshold. 2D: Comparison of the potentials of maximal current amplitude obtained from current/voltage-relationships. In the presence of β-BuTX the maximal current amplitude was observed at much more negative potentials. 2E: Comparison of potentials of half maximal activation obtained from Boltzmann fits; β-BuTX shifted the voltage-dependent activation towards more negative voltages which was reversed by indomethacin. 2F: Comparison of the slope-factors of current/voltage-relationships obtained from Boltzmann fits; with β-BuTX the curves were much steeper than under control conditions which could be reversed by indomethacin. (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001).
Figure 3Analysis of changes in the time-dependent activation of TTX-sensitive currents by β-BuTX or indomethacin. 3A: Comparison of the activation time constants: activation time constants were estimated by single exponential fits for each voltage. Indomethacin led to acceleration of the time-dependent activation which could not reversed by β-BuTX. 3B: Comparison of the inactivation time constants: inactivation time constants were estimated by single exponential fits and plotted against the membrane potentials. Neither β-BuTX nor indomethacin showed any influence on time-dependent inactivation. (* p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001).
Figure 4Analysis of the ratio of arachidonic acid and metabolites of arachidonic acid in neurons under influence of β-bungarotoxin. 4A: Ratio of relative signal intensities of arachidonic acid metabolites to arachidonic acid was calculated for each individual spectrum after MALDI-TOF analysis. 4B: Table of mass signals of different eicosanoids in the MALDI-TOF spectrum. (** p < 0.01).