WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: While recent publications have suggested the pharmacokinetics (PK) of vismodegib appear to be non-linear, there has not been a report describing the mechanisms of non-linearity. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This study provides evidence that two separate processes, namely, solubility-limited absorption and concentration-dependent plasma protein binding, can explain the non-linear PK of vismodegib. This study provides quantitative results which can account for the lower than expected accumulation of vismodegib with continuous daily dosing. AIM: Vismodegib has demonstrated clinical activity in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of vismodegib are non-linear. The objective of this study was to determine whether vismodegib PK change following repeated dosing by administering a tracer intravenous (i.v.) dose of (14) C-vismodegib with single and multiple oral doses. METHODS: Healthy post menopausal female subjects (n= 6/group) received either a single or daily 150 mg vismodegib oral dose with a (14) C-labelled 10 µg i.v. bolus dose administered 2 h after the single or last oral dose (day 7). Plasma samples were assayed for vismodegib by LC-MS/MS and for (14) C-vismodegib by accelerator mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Following a single i.v. dose, mean clearance, volume of distribution and absolute bioavailability were 43.4 ml h(-1) , 16.4 l and 31.8%, respectively. Parallel concentration-time profiles following single oral and i.v. administration of vismodegib indicated elimination rate limited PK. Following i.v. administration at steady-state, mean clearance and volume of distribution were 78.5 ml h(-1) and 26.8 l, respectively. Comparison of i.v. PK parameters after single and multiple oral dosing showed similar half-life, increased clearance and volume of distribution (81% and 63% higher, respectively) and decreased bioavailability (77% lower) after repeated dosing. Relative to single dose, the unbound fraction of vismodegib increased 2.4-fold with continuous daily dosing. CONCLUSION: Vismodegib exhibited a long terminal half-life after oral and i.v. administration, moderate absolute bioavailability and non-linear PK after repeated dosing. Results from this study suggest that the non-linear PK of vismodegib result from two separate, non-linear processes, namely solubility limited absorption and high affinity, saturable plasma protein binding.
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: While recent publications have suggested the pharmacokinetics (PK) of vismodegib appear to be non-linear, there has not been a report describing the mechanisms of non-linearity. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This study provides evidence that two separate processes, namely, solubility-limited absorption and concentration-dependent plasma protein binding, can explain the non-linear PK of vismodegib. This study provides quantitative results which can account for the lower than expected accumulation of vismodegib with continuous daily dosing. AIM: Vismodegib has demonstrated clinical activity in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of vismodegib are non-linear. The objective of this study was to determine whether vismodegib PK change following repeated dosing by administering a tracer intravenous (i.v.) dose of (14) C-vismodegib with single and multiple oral doses. METHODS: Healthy post menopausal female subjects (n= 6/group) received either a single or daily 150 mg vismodegib oral dose with a (14) C-labelled 10 µg i.v. bolus dose administered 2 h after the single or last oral dose (day 7). Plasma samples were assayed for vismodegib by LC-MS/MS and for (14) C-vismodegib by accelerator mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Following a single i.v. dose, mean clearance, volume of distribution and absolute bioavailability were 43.4 ml h(-1) , 16.4 l and 31.8%, respectively. Parallel concentration-time profiles following single oral and i.v. administration of vismodegib indicated elimination rate limited PK. Following i.v. administration at steady-state, mean clearance and volume of distribution were 78.5 ml h(-1) and 26.8 l, respectively. Comparison of i.v. PK parameters after single and multiple oral dosing showed similar half-life, increased clearance and volume of distribution (81% and 63% higher, respectively) and decreased bioavailability (77% lower) after repeated dosing. Relative to single dose, the unbound fraction of vismodegib increased 2.4-fold with continuous daily dosing. CONCLUSION: Vismodegib exhibited a long terminal half-life after oral and i.v. administration, moderate absolute bioavailability and non-linear PK after repeated dosing. Results from this study suggest that the non-linear PK of vismodegib result from two separate, non-linear processes, namely solubility limited absorption and high affinity, saturable plasma protein binding.
Authors: Patricia M Lorusso; Antonio Jimeno; Grace Dy; Alex Adjei; Jordan Berlin; Lawrence Leichman; Jennifer A Low; Dawn Colburn; Ilsung Chang; Sravanthi Cheeti; Jin Y Jin; Richard A Graham Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-07-13 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Alan V Boddy; Julieann Sludden; Melanie J Griffin; Colin Garner; John Kendrick; Pritesh Mistry; Catherine Dutreix; David R Newell; Stephen G O'Brien Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-07-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Charles M Rudin; Christine L Hann; John Laterra; Robert L Yauch; Christopher A Callahan; Ling Fu; Thomas Holcomb; Jeremy Stinson; Stephen E Gould; Barbara Coleman; Patricia M LoRusso; Daniel D Von Hoff; Frederic J de Sauvage; Jennifer A Low Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-09-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Daniel D Von Hoff; Patricia M LoRusso; Charles M Rudin; Josina C Reddy; Robert L Yauch; Raoul Tibes; Glen J Weiss; Mitesh J Borad; Christine L Hann; Julie R Brahmer; Howard M Mackey; Bertram L Lum; Walter C Darbonne; James C Marsters; Frederic J de Sauvage; Jennifer A Low Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-09-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Manish R Sharma; Theodore G Karrison; Bethany Kell; Kehua Wu; Michelle Turcich; David Geary; Soonmo P Kang; Naoko Takebe; Richard A Graham; Michael L Maitland; Richard L Schilsky; Mark J Ratain; Ezra E W Cohen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-04-03 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Duhyeong Hwang; Taylor Dismuke; Andrey Tikunov; Elias P Rosen; John R Kagel; Jacob D Ramsey; Chaemin Lim; William Zamboni; Alexander V Kabanov; Timothy R Gershon; Marina Sokolsky-Papkov PhD Journal: Nanomedicine Date: 2020-11-28 Impact factor: 5.307
Authors: Vikram Malhi; Dawn Colburn; Sarah J Williams; Cornelis E C A Hop; Mark J Dresser; Priya Chandra; Richard A Graham Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 3.333