Literature DB >> 22458619

Successful implementation of cognitive interviews in special populations.

Carla J DeMuro1, Sandra A Lewis, Dana B DiBenedetti, Mark A Price, Sheri E Fehnel.   

Abstract

The cognitive interview, with a focus on debriefing methods, was developed in the 1980s to identify sources of potential response error in surveys or questionnaires. With the release of the final US FDA guidance, titled 'Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims', cognitive interviews have gained importance and relevance both for concept elicitation and debriefing purposes in the context of instrument development. This article is intended as a guide for the researcher working with special populations in methods to foster successful cognitive interviews that meet FDA standards. While many of these techniques are broadly applicable, specific recommendations are provided for working with pediatric and cognitively challenged populations, as well as with individuals with communication difficulties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22458619     DOI: 10.1586/erp.11.103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res        ISSN: 1473-7167            Impact factor:   2.217


  8 in total

1.  Development of the Initial Surveys for the All of Us Research Program.

Authors:  Robert M Cronin; Rebecca N Jerome; Brandy Mapes; Regina Andrade; Rebecca Johnston; Jennifer Ayala; David Schlundt; Kemberlee Bonnet; Sunil Kripalani; Kathryn Goggins; Kenneth A Wallston; Mick P Couper; Michael R Elliott; Paul Harris; Mark Begale; Fatima Munoz; Maria Lopez-Class; David Cella; David Condon; Mona AuYoung; Kathleen M Mazor; Steve Mikita; Michael Manganiello; Nicholas Borselli; Stephanie Fowler; Joni L Rutter; Joshua C Denny; Elizabeth W Karlson; Brian K Ahmedani; Christopher J O'Donnell
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Child and parent perspectives of the chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) symptom experience: a concept elicitation study.

Authors:  Lori Wiener; Kristin Baird; Caroline Crum; Kimberly Powers; Paul Carpenter; K Scott Baker; Margaret L MacMillan; Eneida Nemecek; Jin-Shei Lai; Sandra A Mitchell; David A Jacobsohn
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Adapting cognitive interviewing for nursing research.

Authors:  Shigeko Izumi; Roxanne Vandermause; Sandra Benavides-Vaello
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 2.228

4.  Institutional procedural discrimination, institutional racism, and other institutional discrimination: A nursing research example.

Authors:  Sungwon Lim; Doris M Boutain; Eunjung Kim; Robin A Evans-Agnew; Sanithia Parker; Rebekah Maldonado Nofziger
Journal:  Nurs Inq       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Assessing the burden of treatment-emergent adverse events associated with atypical antipsychotic medications.

Authors:  Pierre-Michel Llorca; Christophe Lançon; Ann Hartry; T Michelle Brown; Dana B DiBenedetti; Siddhesh A Kamat; Clément François
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  Considerations for conducting and reporting digitally supported cognitive interviews with children and adults.

Authors:  Abigail Fry; Sandra A Mitchell; Lori Wiener
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2021-12-18

7.  Cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of the Arabic version of Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ).

Authors:  Ahmed Amer; Mahmoud A Alomari; Gustav Jarl; Majd M Ajarmeh; Fathi Migdadi; Ann-Christin Eliasson; Liselotte Hermansson
Journal:  Hong Kong J Occup Ther       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 1.476

8.  Using online technologies to improve diversity and inclusion in cognitive interviews with young people.

Authors:  Ushma D Upadhyay; Heather Lipkovich
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.615

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.