Literature DB >> 22458345

Effect of sample storage on blood crossmatching in horses.

M Harris1, R Nolen-Walston, W Ashton, M May, K Jackson, R Boston.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Blood samples banked for up to 1 month are typically used to perform pretransfusion testing in humans and small animals, but this has not been validated using blood from horses. HYPOTHESIS: Compatibility of equine blood samples is repeatable using fresh samples, and reproducible using donor blood samples stored for up to 4 weeks. ANIMALS: Six healthy adult horses.
METHODS: Randomized, blinded experimental study. Immunologic compatibility of the blood of all horses was assessed using a major and minor saline agglutination and hemolysin crossmatch using blood samples refrigerated for 0-4 weeks and fresh blood from the same horses. Crossmatch results were scored and then compared to identify changes of compatibility in each of the 4 tests. In addition, repeatability of the crossmatch technique itself was assessed by performing 6 iterations of this procedure in immediate succession with fresh blood from 3 horses.
RESULTS: No significant difference in crossmatch results was found using fresh blood (P = .39-1.00). Reproducibility was poor using blood stored for 1-4 weeks, especially in tests using stored erythrocytes (major antigen crossmatches), with significant differences from baseline at all weeks (P < .05); 13 of these differences were positive, indicating poorer compatibility. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Equine blood crossmatching is repeatable using fresh blood, although decreased apparent compatibility after storage makes exclusion of compatible donors more likely than mistaken administration of incompatible blood. These data suggest that fresh samples should be collected from potential donors before crossmatching equine blood.
Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22458345     DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2012.00913.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Intern Med        ISSN: 0891-6640            Impact factor:   3.333


  7 in total

1.  Crossmatching Maternal and Fetal Blood in Sheep.

Authors:  Gabrielle C Musk; Murray J Adams; Haruo Usuda; Matthew W Kemp; Claire R Sharp
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 0.982

2.  Maternal-fetal Blood Major Crossmatching in Merino Sheep.

Authors:  Gabrielle C Musk; Haruo Usuda; Helen Kershaw; Matthew W Kemp; Claire R Sharp
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 0.982

3.  Survival Time of Cross-Match Incompatible Red Blood Cells in Adult Horses.

Authors:  J E Tomlinson; E Taberner; R C Boston; S D Owens; R D Nolen-Walston
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Comparison of Tube, Gel, and Immunochromatographic Strip Methods for Evaluation of Blood Transfusion Compatibility in Horses.

Authors:  D Luethy; S D Owens; D Stefanovski; R Nolen-Walston; U Giger
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Agreement of stall-side and laboratory major crossmatch tests with the reference standard method in horses.

Authors:  Melissa S Fenn; Araba D Bortsie-Aryee; Gillian A Perkins; Sabine Mann; Joy E Tomlinson; Emma M Wood; Susan E Mix; Tracy Stokol
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Alloimmunization in dogs after transfusion: A serial cross-match study.

Authors:  Lisa Herter; Christiane Weingart; Nina Merten; Nicole Bock; Roswitha Merle; Barbara Kohn
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.175

7.  Prevalence of naturally occurring non-AB blood type incompatibilities in cats and influence of crossmatch on transfusion outcomes.

Authors:  Megan E McClosky; Dorothy Cimino Brown; Nicole M Weinstein; Nicole Chappini; Michael T Taney; Kimberly Marryott; Mary Beth Callan
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.333

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.