Literature DB >> 22458315

Cognitive appraisals of specialty mental health services and their relation to mental health service utilization in the rural population.

Tisha L Deen1, Ana J Bridges, Tara C McGahan, Arthur R Andrews.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Rural individuals utilize specialty mental health services (eg, psychiatrists, psychologists, counselors, and social workers) at lower rates than their urban counterparts. This study explores whether cognitive appraisals (ie, individual perceptions of need for services, outcome expectancies, and value of a positive therapeutic outcome) of help-seeking for depression symptoms are related to the utilization of specialty mental health services in a rural sample.
METHODS: Demographic and environmental characteristics, cultural barriers, cognitive appraisals, and depression symptoms were assessed in one model predicting specialty mental health service utilization (MHSU) in a rural sample. Three hypotheses were proposed: (1) a higher number of environmental barriers (eg, lack of insurance or transportation) would predict lower specialty mental health service utilization; (2) an increase in cultural barriers (stigma, stoicism, and lack of anonymity) would predict lower specialty mental health utilization; and (3) higher cognitive appraisals of mental health services would predict specialty mental health care utilization beyond the predictive capacities of psychiatric symptoms, demographic variables, environmental barriers, and cultural barriers.
FINDINGS: Current depression symptoms significantly predicted lifetime specialty mental health service utilization. Hypotheses 1 and 2 were not supported: more environmental barriers predicted higher levels of specialty MHSU while cultural barriers did not predict specialty mental health service utilization. Hypothesis 3 was supported: cognitive appraisals significantly predicted specialty mental health service utilization.
CONCLUSIONS: It will be important to target perceptions and attitudes about mental health services to reduce disparities in specialty MHSU for the rural population.
© 2011 National Rural Health Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22458315      PMCID: PMC4060821          DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2011.00375.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rural Health        ISSN: 0890-765X            Impact factor:   4.333


  22 in total

1.  Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Wai Tat Chiu; Olga Demler; Kathleen R Merikangas; Ellen E Walters
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2005-06

Review 2.  Patterns of mental health service utilization.

Authors:  K I Howard; T A Cornille; J S Lyons; J T Vessey; R J Lueger; S M Saunders
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1996-08

3.  Help-seeking by rural residents for mental health problems: the importance of agrarian values.

Authors:  Fiona Judd; Henry Jackson; Angela Komiti; Greg Murray; Caitlin Fraser; Aaron Grieve; Rapson Gomez
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.744

4.  Lengthening spells of uninsurance and their consequences.

Authors:  K J Mueller; K Patil; F Ullrich
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Rural-urban differences in stigma and the use of care for depressive disorders.

Authors:  K Rost; G R Smith; J L Taylor
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Twelve-month use of mental health services in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.

Authors:  Philip S Wang; Michael Lane; Mark Olfson; Harold A Pincus; Kenneth B Wells; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2005-06

7.  Differences in the use of psychiatric outpatient services between the United States and Ontario.

Authors:  R C Kessler; R G Frank; M Edlund; S J Katz; E Lin; P Leaf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-02-20       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Results from the National Comorbidity Survey.

Authors:  R C Kessler; K A McGonagle; S Zhao; C B Nelson; M Hughes; S Eshleman; H U Wittchen; K S Kendler
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1994-01

9.  The prevalence and distribution of major depression in a national community sample: the National Comorbidity Survey.

Authors:  D G Blazer; R C Kessler; K A McGonagle; M S Swartz
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  The de facto US mental and addictive disorders service system. Epidemiologic catchment area prospective 1-year prevalence rates of disorders and services.

Authors:  D A Regier; W E Narrow; D S Rae; R W Manderscheid; B Z Locke; F K Goodwin
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1993-02
View more
  4 in total

1.  Mental health and migration: depression, alcohol abuse, and access to health care among migrants in Central Asia.

Authors:  Leyla Ismayilova; Hae Nim Lee; Stacey Shaw; Nabila El-Bassel; Louisa Gilbert; Assel Terlikbayeva; Yelena Rozental
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-12

2.  Complementary primary mental health programs for young people in Australia: Access to Allied Psychological Services (ATAPS) and headspace.

Authors:  Bridget Bassilios; Nicolas Telford; Debra Rickwood; Matthew J Spittal; Jane Pirkis
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2017-02-10

3.  Depression, Depression Literacy, and Sociodemographic Characteristics of Korean Americans: A Preliminary Investigation.

Authors:  Kunsook Bernstein; Young-Me Lee; Philmon N Gona; ShinHi Han; Soonsik Kim; Sun S Kim
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2020-10-01

4.  What limits the utilization of health services among the rural population in the Dabie Mountains- evidence from Hubei province, China?

Authors:  Pengqian Fang; Shilong Han; Lu Zhao; Zi Fang; Yang Zhang; Xiaoxu Zou
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.