| Literature DB >> 22457605 |
Hongguo Cao1, Pan Yang, Yong Pu, Xueping Sun, Huiqun Yin, Yu Zhang, Yunhai Zhang, Yunsheng Li, Ya Liu, Fugui Fang, Zijun Zhang, Yong Tao, Xiaorong Zhang.
Abstract
Pluripotent stem cells from domesticated animals have potential applications in transgenic breeding. Here, we describe induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells derived from bovine fetal fibroblasts by lentiviral transduction of Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc defined-factor fusion proteins. Bovine iPS cells showed typical colony morphology, normal karyotypes, stained positively for alkaline phosphatase (AP) and expressed Oct4, Nanog and SSEA1. The CpG in the promoter regions of Oct4 and Nanog were highly unmethylated in bovine iPS cells compared to the fibroblasts. The cells were able to differentiate into cell types of all three germ layers in vitro and in vivo. In addition, these cells were induced into female germ cells under defined culture conditions and expressed early and late female germ cell-specific genes Vasa, Dazl, Gdf9, Nobox, Zp2, and Zp3. Our data suggest that bovine iPS cells were generated from bovine fetal fibroblasts with defined-factor fusion proteins mediated by lentivirus and have potential applications in bovine transgenic breeding and gene-modified animals.Entities:
Keywords: bovine; defined-factor fusion proteins; fetal fibroblasts; iPS cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22457605 PMCID: PMC3314191 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.3723
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biol Sci ISSN: 1449-2288 Impact factor: 6.580
The primers used for RT-PCR
| Genes | Sequences of primers | Productions (bp) | Tm (°C ) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ExoOct4 | F: 5′-GCTCTCCCATGCATTCAAAC-3′ | 350 | 55 |
| EndoOct4 | F: 5′- CAGACACCACCGCCACCAGC -3′ | 416 | 55 |
| ExoKlf4 | F: 5′- TCCAGTGCCAGAAGTGCGAC -3′ | 380 | 55 |
| EndoKlf4 | F: 5′-ACTGTCATCCTGCCCTGCC -3′ | 412 | 55 |
| Nanog | F: 5′- ACCAGA GAATGAAATGTAAG -3′ | 382 | 55 |
| GDF9 | F: 5′- TTTGCCTGGCTCTGTTT-3′ | 288 | 53 |
| ZP2 | F: 5′- AGAATGACGGTGAGGTGC -3′ | 353 | 53 |
| ZP3 | F: 5′- CTTCAGCAAGTCCTCCAACA-3′ | 293 | 57 |
| VASA | F: 5′- GGTAGTTTCCGAGGTTGC -3′ | 347 | 52 |
| DAZL | F: 5′- TCCTCCACCACAATTTCA-3′ | 364 | 50 |
| GAPDH | F: 5′- TTGGTATCGTGGAAGGACTCTA -3′ | 270 | 55 |
The primers used for quantitative real-time RT-PCR△ and bisulphite genomic sequencing◇
| Genes | Sequences of primers | Productions(bp) | Tm (°C ) |
|---|---|---|---|
| △EndoOct4 | F: 5′- GAACCCTGAGGAGTCCCAGGACATCA -3′ | 306 | 60 |
| △Nanog | F: 5′- CGACACGGACACTGTCTCTCCTCTTC -3′ | 287 | 60 |
| △β-Actin | F: 5′- GAGCGGGAAATCGTCCGTGAC -3′ | 278 | 60 |
| ◇Oct4 | F:5′- GTTTGGAGAGGGGTTTTGAAGAATGTGTAG -3′ | 260 | 60 |
| ◇Nanog | F:5′- TAGGTGGTTATAGGAGATGTATTTTTGATT - 3′ | 260 | 60 |
Figure 1Generation of bovine iPS cells from Holstein fetal fibroblasts by lentiviral transduction. (A) Time schedule of bovine iPS cell generation after the 4th lentivivus infection. (B)Round cells and colonies (1: normal light, 2: under fluorescence) appeared after the 4th lentivivus infection. (C) The 10th passage bovine iPS cell colonies at the 2nd day after passage are shown (1: normal light; 2: under fluorescence). (D) The 10th passage bovine iPS cell colonies at the 3rd day after passage are shown (1: normal light; 2: under fluorescence), scale bar: 200 μm. (E) Positive AP staining of the 9th passage bovine iPS cells is shown. (F) Normal karyotype (30 pairs) of the 10th passage bovine iPS cells is shown.
Figure 2Expression of stem cell marker genes and methylation status in the promoter regions of Oct4 and Nanog. BEF1 and BEF2 represented different Un-infected bovine embryonic fibroblast lines; BiPS1 and BiPS2 represented different 10th passage bovine iPS cell lines. (A) The exogenous and endogenous gene expression was analyzed by RT-PCR. (B) The endogenous Oct4 and Nanog expression was analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR. (C) The exogenous and endogenous Oct4 expression was analyzed by western blotting. Exogenous Oct4 protein (70KDa) was composed of Oct4 protein (43KDa) and EGFP (27KDa). (D) Bisulfite sequencing analysis of the Nanog and Oct4 promoters is shown. White and black circles indicate unmethylated and methylated CpG, respectively.
Figure 3Expression of pluripotent markers in the 10th passage bovine iPS cells. scale bar: 100 μm. (A1) Bovine iPS cells were used as pluripotent marker Oct4 analysis. (A2) The immunofluorescence staining of marker Oct4 is shown. (A3) EGFP expression is shown. (A4) The merge is shown. (B1) Bovine iPS cells were used as pluripotent marker Nanog analysis. (B2) The immunofluorescence staining of marker Nanog is shown. (B3) EGFP expression is shown. (B4) The merge is shown. (C1) Bovine iPS cells were used as pluripotent marker SSEA1 analysis. (C2) The immunofluorescence staining of marker SSEA1 is shown. (C3) EGFP expression is shown. (C4) The merge is shown.
Figure 4In vitro differentiation analyses for the three germ layers in the 12th passage bovine iPS cells. scale bar: 100 μm. (A1) EBs expressing marker α-Actinin (Sarcomeric, mesoderm) are shown. (A2) The immunofluorescence staining of mesoderm marker α-Actinin is shown. (A3) EGFP expression in EBs is shown. (A4)The merge is shown. (B1) EBs expressing marker Neurofilament (ectoderm) are shown. (B2)The immunofluorescence staining of ectoderm marker Neurofilament is shown. (B3) EGFP expression in EBs is shown. (B4)The merge is shown. (C1) EBs expressing marker a-Fetoprotein(AFP, endoderm) are shown. (C2) The immunofluorescence staining of endoderm marker a-Fetoprotein is shown. (C3) EGFP expression in EBs is shown. (C4)The merge is shown.
Figure 5Teratoma formation in vivo including three germ layer with the 10th passage bovine iPS cells. Three germ layers including muscle tissue (mesoderm) (A), gut-like gland tissue (endoderm) (B), hair follicle (ectoderm) (C) in the teratomas (D) are shown.
Figure 6SSEA1 stable expression in bovine iPS cells by flow cytometer and the expression of female gamete specific genes in the EBs by RT-PCR. (A1) Negative control as quantitative flow cytometric analysis of bovine iPS cell surface antigen SSEA1 is shown. (A2) Quantitative flow cytometric analysis of the 10th passage bovine iPS cell surface antigen SSEA1 is shown. (A3) Quantitative flow cytometric analysis of the 20th passage bovine iPS cell surface antigen SSEA1 is shown. (A4) Quantitative flow cytometric analysis of the 30th passage bovine iPS cell surface antigen SSEA1 is shown. (B) the expression of female gamete specific genes in the EBs from 10th passage bovine iPS cells is shown.
Figure 7Expression of female gamete specific markers in the EBs from the 12th passage bovine iPS cells. scale bar: 100 μm. (A1) Arrow indicated oocyte-like cell. (A2) Arrow indicated oocyte-like complex in suspended EBs. (A3) Arrow indicated oocyte-like cell in suspended EBs. (A4) Arrow indicated oocyte-like cell in adherent EBs. (B1) Bovine iPS cells were used as marker Vasa analysis. (B2) The immunofluorescence staining of pluripotent marker Vasa is shown. (B3) EGFP expression is shown. (B4) The merge is shown. (C1) Bovine iPS cells were used as marker Nobox analysis. (C2) The immunofluorescence staining of marker Nobox is shown. (C3) EGFP expression is shown. (C4) The merge is shown.