Literature DB >> 22457505

Push-pull control of motor output.

Michael D Johnson1, Allison S Hyngstrom, Marin Manuel, C J Heckman.   

Abstract

Inhibition usually decreases input-output excitability of neurons. If, however, inhibition is coupled to excitation in a push-pull fashion, where inhibition decreases as excitation increases, neuron excitability can be increased. Although the presence of push-pull organization has been demonstrated in single cells, its functional impact on neural processing depends on its effect on the system level. We studied push-pull in the motor output stage of the feline spinal cord, a system that allows independent control of inhibitory and excitatory components. Push-pull organization was clearly present in ankle extensor motoneurons, producing increased peak-to-peak modulation of synaptic currents. The effect at the system level was equally strong. Independent control of the inhibitory component showed that the stronger the background of inhibition, the greater the peak force production. This illustrates the paradox at the heart of push-pull organization: increased force output can be achieved by increasing background inhibition to provide greater disinhibition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22457505      PMCID: PMC3335194          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4709-11.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  59 in total

1.  Proprioceptive control of extensor activity during fictive scratching and weight support compared to fictive locomotion.

Authors:  M C Perreault; M Enriquez-Denton; H Hultborn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Impact of network activities on neuronal properties in corticothalamic systems.

Authors:  M Steriade
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Input-output functions of mammalian motoneurons.

Authors:  R K Powers; M D Binder
Journal:  Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.545

Review 4.  State-dependent modulation of sensory feedback.

Authors:  H Hultborn
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Adjustable amplification of synaptic input in the dendrites of spinal motoneurons in vivo.

Authors:  R H Lee; C J Heckman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Firing properties of spinal interneurons during voluntary movement. II. Interactions between spinal neurons.

Authors:  Yifat Prut; Steve I Perlmutter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Firing properties of spinal interneurons during voluntary movement. I. State-dependent regularity of firing.

Authors:  Yifat Prut; Steve I Perlmutter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Gain modulation from background synaptic input.

Authors:  Frances S Chance; L F Abbott; Alex D Reyes
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 9.  The high-conductance state of neocortical neurons in vivo.

Authors:  Alain Destexhe; Michael Rudolph; Denis Paré
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Variable amplification of synaptic input to cat spinal motoneurones by dendritic persistent inward current.

Authors:  H Hultborn; M Enríquez Denton; J Wienecke; J B Nielsen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  16 in total

1.  Cadence-dependent changes in corticospinal excitability of the biceps brachii during arm cycling.

Authors:  Davis A Forman; Devin T G Philpott; Duane C Button; Kevin E Power
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Frequency-dependent amplification of stretch-evoked excitatory input in spinal motoneurons.

Authors:  Randall K Powers; Paul Nardelli; T C Cope
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Motoneuron intrinsic properties, but not their receptive fields, recover in chronic spinal injury.

Authors:  Michael D Johnson; Elma Kajtaz; Charlette M Cain; C J Heckman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The optimal neural strategy for a stable motor task requires a compromise between level of muscle cocontraction and synaptic gain of afferent feedback.

Authors:  Jakob L Dideriksen; Francesco Negro; Dario Farina
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  The potential for understanding the synaptic organization of human motor commands via the firing patterns of motoneurons.

Authors:  Michael D Johnson; Christopher K Thompson; Vicki M Tysseling; Randall K Powers; Charles J Heckman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Synaptic control of the shape of the motoneuron pool input-output function.

Authors:  Randall K Powers; Charles J Heckman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  NMDA induces persistent inward and outward currents that cause rhythmic bursting in adult rodent motoneurons.

Authors:  Marin Manuel; Yaqing Li; Sherif M Elbasiouny; Katie Murray; Anna Griener; C J Heckman; David J Bennett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Precise control of movement kinematics by optogenetic inhibition of Purkinje cell activity.

Authors:  Shane A Heiney; Jinsook Kim; George J Augustine; Javier F Medina
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Estimates of persistent inward current in human motor neurons during postural sway.

Authors:  Ryan C A Foley; Jayne M Kalmar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Inhibition downunder: an update from the spinal cord.

Authors:  Martyn Goulding; Steeve Bourane; Lidia Garcia-Campmany; Antoine Dalet; Stephanie Koch
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.