BACKGROUND: The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a well-established instrument used to evaluate the health status of heart failure (HF) patients. There has been a lack of clarity about the best way to conceptualize the KCCQ. The purpose of this investigation of the KCCQ was to: (1) explore the factor structure with an exploratory factor analyses; (2) perform reliability and validity testing to determine the best factor solution for item groupings; and (3) determine the most meaningful components of health status captured by the KCCQ. METHODS AND RESULTS: A secondary analysis of data from 280 adults with stage-C HF enrolled from three US northeastern sites was conducted to test the KCCQ subscale structure. Criterion-related validity for the Self-efficacy subscale was tested with the Dutch Heart Failure Knowledge Scale and the Self-care of Heart Failure Index Self-care Confidence Scale. Overall, internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha) for the KCCQ and subscales was 0.92, social interference (seven items, 0.90), physical limitation (four items, 0.84), symptoms (eight items, 0.86), independent care (two items, 0.80), and self-efficacy (two items, 0.63). Two items failed to correspond to a previously identified factor so the independent care subscale was added. Items intending to measure quality of life were loaded in the social interference subscale. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend eliminating the quality of life subscale and including those items in the social interference subscale, and eliminating the self-efficacy items and re-evaluating the items related to independent care.
BACKGROUND: The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a well-established instrument used to evaluate the health status of heart failure (HF) patients. There has been a lack of clarity about the best way to conceptualize the KCCQ. The purpose of this investigation of the KCCQ was to: (1) explore the factor structure with an exploratory factor analyses; (2) perform reliability and validity testing to determine the best factor solution for item groupings; and (3) determine the most meaningful components of health status captured by the KCCQ. METHODS AND RESULTS: A secondary analysis of data from 280 adults with stage-C HF enrolled from three US northeastern sites was conducted to test the KCCQ subscale structure. Criterion-related validity for the Self-efficacy subscale was tested with the Dutch Heart Failure Knowledge Scale and the Self-care of Heart Failure Index Self-care Confidence Scale. Overall, internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha) for the KCCQ and subscales was 0.92, social interference (seven items, 0.90), physical limitation (four items, 0.84), symptoms (eight items, 0.86), independent care (two items, 0.80), and self-efficacy (two items, 0.63). Two items failed to correspond to a previously identified factor so the independent care subscale was added. Items intending to measure quality of life were loaded in the social interference subscale. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend eliminating the quality of life subscale and including those items in the social interference subscale, and eliminating the self-efficacy items and re-evaluating the items related to independent care.
Authors: Barbara Riegel; Stephen T Moelter; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Susan J Pressler; Sabina De Geest; Sheryl Potashnik; Desiree Fleck; Daohang Sha; Steven L Sayers; William S Weintraub; Terri E Weaver; Lee R Goldberg Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2010-12-24 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Hermann Faller; Thomas Steinbüchel; Marion Schowalter; John A Spertus; Stefan Störk; Christiane E Angermann Journal: Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol Date: 2005 Mar-Apr
Authors: Teresa Ortega; Beatriz Díaz-Molina; Ma Angeles Montoliu; Francisco Ortega; Covadonga Valdés; Pablo Rebollo; Maria Almenar; Marta Iscar Journal: Transplantation Date: 2008-09-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Martje H L van der Wal; Tiny Jaarsma; Debra K Moser; Dirk J van Veldhuisen Journal: Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs Date: 2005-08-29 Impact factor: 3.908
Authors: Windy W Alonso; Kenneth M Faulkner; Bunny J Pozehl; Judith E Hupcey; Lisa A Kitko; Christopher S Lee Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2020-07-06 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Vittal Hejjaji; Yuanyuan Tang; Theresa Coles; Philip G Jones; Bryce B Reeve; Robert J Mentz; Erica S Spatz; Shannon M Dunlay; Brittany Caldwell; Anindita Saha; Michelle E Tarver; Andy Tran; Krishna K Patel; Debra Henke; Ileana L Piña; John A Spertus Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 10.447
Authors: Rachel Wells; James Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Andres Azuero; Harleah Buck; Deborah Ejem; Kathryn L Burgio; Macy L Stockdill; Rodney Tucker; Salpy V Pamboukian; Jose Tallaj; Sally Engler; Konda Keebler; Sheri Tims; Raegan Durant; Keith M Swetz; Marie Bakitas Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 5.576
Authors: Kiswendsida Sawadogo; Jérôme Ambroise; Steven Vercauteren; Marc Castadot; Michel Vanhalewyn; Jacques Col; Annie Robert Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-10-11 Impact factor: 4.147