Literature DB >> 22457352

Mechanisms for defining supercoiling set point of DNA gyrase orthologs: II. The shape of the GyrA subunit C-terminal domain (CTD) is not a sole determinant for controlling supercoiling efficiency.

Elsa M Tretter1, James M Berger.   

Abstract

DNA topoisomerases are essential enzymes that can overwind, underwind, and disentangle double-helical DNA segments to maintain the topological state of chromosomes. Nearly all bacteria utilize a unique type II topoisomerase, gyrase, which actively adds negative supercoils to chromosomes using an ATP-dependent DNA strand passage mechanism; however, the specific activities of these enzymes can vary markedly from species to species. Escherichia coli gyrase is known to favor supercoiling over decatenation (Zechiedrich, E. L., Khodursky, A. B., and Cozzarelli, N. R. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 2580-2592), whereas the opposite has been reported for Mycobacterium tuberculosis gyrase (Aubry, A., Fisher, L. M., Jarlier, V., and Cambau, E. (2006) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 348, 158-165). Here, we set out to understand the molecular basis for these differences using structural and biochemical approaches. Contrary to expectations based on phylogenetic inferences, we find that the dedicated DNA wrapping domains (the C-terminal domains) of both gyrases are highly similar, both architecturally and in their ability to introduce writhe into DNA. However, the M. tuberculosis enzyme lacks a C-terminal control element recently uncovered in E. coli gyrase (see accompanying article (Tretter, E. M., and Berger, J. M. (2012) J. Biol. Chem. 287, 18636-18644)) and turns over ATP at a much slower rate. Together, these findings demonstrate that C-terminal domain shape is not the sole regulatory determinant of gyrase activity and instead indicate that an inability to tightly couple DNA wrapping to ATP turnover is why M. tuberculosis gyrase cannot supercoil DNA to the same extent as its γ-proteobacterial counterpart. Our observations demonstrate that gyrase has been modified in multiple ways throughout evolution to fine-tune its specific catalytic properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22457352      PMCID: PMC3365746          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.345736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  49 in total

1.  A model for the mechanism of strand passage by DNA gyrase.

Authors:  S C Kampranis; A D Bates; A Maxwell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Preferential relaxation of positively supercoiled DNA by E. coli topoisomerase IV in single-molecule and ensemble measurements.

Authors:  N J Crisona; T R Strick; D Bensimon; V Croquette; N R Cozzarelli
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  PHENIX: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination.

Authors:  Paul D Adams; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Li Wei Hung; Thomas R Ioerger; Airlie J McCoy; Nigel W Moriarty; Randy J Read; James C Sacchettini; Nicholas K Sauter; Thomas C Terwilliger
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2002-10-21

4.  Structure validation by Calpha geometry: phi,psi and Cbeta deviation.

Authors:  Simon C Lovell; Ian W Davis; W Bryan Arendall; Paul I W de Bakker; J Michael Word; Michael G Prisant; Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-02-15

5.  Isolation of kinetoplast DNA.

Authors:  T A Shapiro; V A Klein; P T Englund
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  1999

6.  The C-terminal domain of DNA gyrase A adopts a DNA-bending beta-pinwheel fold.

Authors:  Kevin D Corbett; Ryan K Shultzaberger; James M Berger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Structure of the topoisomerase IV C-terminal domain: a broken beta-propeller implies a role as geometry facilitator in catalysis.

Authors:  Tung-Ju Hsieh; Lynn Farh; Wai Mun Huang; Nei-Li Chan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-10-04       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Tobacco etch virus protease: mechanism of autolysis and rational design of stable mutants with wild-type catalytic proficiency.

Authors:  R B Kapust; J Tözsér; J D Fox; D E Anderson; S Cherry; T D Copeland; D S Waugh
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  2001-12

9.  Roles of topoisomerases in maintaining steady-state DNA supercoiling in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  E L Zechiedrich; A B Khodursky; S Bachellier; R Schneider; D Chen; D M Lilley; N R Cozzarelli
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-03-17       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Nucleotide binding to DNA gyrase causes loss of DNA wrap.

Authors:  Jonathan G Heddle; Sylvain Mitelheiser; Anthony Maxwell; Neil H Thomson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  27 in total

1.  E. coli Gyrase Fails to Negatively Supercoil Diaminopurine-Substituted DNA.

Authors:  Mónica Fernández-Sierra; Qing Shao; Chandler Fountain; Laura Finzi; David Dunlap
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  The acidic C-terminal tail of the GyrA subunit moderates the DNA supercoiling activity of Bacillus subtilis gyrase.

Authors:  Martin A Lanz; Mohamad Farhat; Dagmar Klostermeier
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Metabolic engineering for L-glutamine overproduction by using DNA gyrase mutations in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Mikiro Hayashi; Kazuhiko Tabata
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Structural Dynamics and Mechanochemical Coupling in DNA Gyrase.

Authors:  Aakash Basu; Angelica C Parente; Zev Bryant
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Mechanisms for defining supercoiling set point of DNA gyrase orthologs: I. A nonconserved acidic C-terminal tail modulates Escherichia coli gyrase activity.

Authors:  Elsa M Tretter; James M Berger
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Targeting the gyrase of Plasmodium falciparum with topoisomerase poisons.

Authors:  Sonya C Tang Girdwood; Elizabeth Nenortas; Theresa A Shapiro
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 7.  RNA polymerase: chromosome domain boundary maker and regulator of supercoil density.

Authors:  N Patrick Higgins
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 7.934

8.  Species-specific supercoil dynamics of the bacterial nucleoid.

Authors:  N Patrick Higgins
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2016-07-20

9.  Functional interactions between gyrase subunits are optimized in a species-specific manner.

Authors:  Daniela Weidlich; Dagmar Klostermeier
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Gyrase containing a single C-terminal domain catalyzes negative supercoiling of DNA by decreasing the linking number in steps of two.

Authors:  Jampa Tsedön Stelljes; Daniela Weidlich; Airat Gubaev; Dagmar Klostermeier
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.