Literature DB >> 2245726

Peers' perceptions of the consequences that victimized children provide aggressors.

D G Perry1, J C Williard, L C Perry.   

Abstract

Fourth- through seventh-grade children (mean age 11.5 years) estimated the likelihood that various consequences would occur following hypothetical acts of aggression toward victimized and nonvictimized classmates. Children also indicated how much they would care if the consequences were to occur. When contemplating aggression toward victimized classmates, children were more likely to expect tangible rewards, more likely to expect signs of victim suffering, and less likely to expect retaliation than when considering aggression against nonvictimized classmates. Also, when considering aggression toward victimized classmates, children cared more about securing tangible rewards but were less disturbed by the thought of hurting their victims or by the thought of their victims retaliating than when imagining aggression toward nonvictimized classmates. The foregoing pattern was stronger for boys than for girls. Implications for theories of aggression and for intervention with aggressive and victimized children are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2245726     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02863.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Dev        ISSN: 0009-3920


  14 in total

1.  Subtypes of victims and aggressors in children's peer groups.

Authors:  D Schwartz
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2000-04

2.  Toward a Relationship Perspective on Aggression among Schoolchildren: Integrating Social Cognitive and Interdependence Theories.

Authors:  Noel A Card
Journal:  Psychol Violence       Date:  2011

3.  Bidirectional Associations between Peer Victimization and Functions of Aggression in Middle Childhood: Further Evaluation across Informants and Academic Years.

Authors:  John L Cooley; Paula J Fite; Casey A Pederson
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2018-01

4.  Trajectories of Peer Victimization: The Role of Multiple Relationships.

Authors:  Rachael D Reavis; Susan P Keane; Susan D Calkins
Journal:  Merrill Palmer Q (Wayne State Univ Press)       Date:  2010-07

5.  The effect of induced mood on children's social information processing: goal clarification and response decision.

Authors:  Bridgette D Harper; Elizabeth A Lemerise; Sarah L Caverly
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2010-07

6.  The Social Context of Young Children's Peer Victimization.

Authors:  Laura D Hanish; Patti Ryan; Carol Lynn Martin; Richard A Fabes
Journal:  Soc Dev       Date:  2005-02

7.  The significance of reciprocal and unilateral friendships for peer victimization in adolescence.

Authors:  Ron H J Scholte; Geertjan Overbeek; Giovanni ten Brink; Els Rommes; Raymond A T de Kemp; Luc Goossens; Rutger C M E Engels
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2008-03-25

8.  Use of a teacher nomination strategy to screen for autism spectrum disorders in general education classrooms: a pilot study.

Authors:  Susan L Hepburn; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Steven Rosenberg; Kristina Kaparich; Cordelia Robinson; Lisa Miller
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2007-07-28

9.  Cross-informant agreement about bullying and victimization among eight-year-olds: whose information best predicts psychiatric caseness 10-15 years later?

Authors:  John A Rønning; Andre Sourander; Kirsti Kumpulainen; Tuula Tamminen; Solja Niemelä; Irma Moilanen; Hans Helenius; Jorma Piha; Fredrik Almqvist
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2008-07-05       Impact factor: 4.328

10.  Depressive symptoms, friend distress, and self-blame: Risk factors for adolescent peer victimization.

Authors:  Hannah L Schacter; Jaana Juvonen
Journal:  J Appl Dev Psychol       Date:  2017-03-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.