BACKGROUND: Long-term follow-up after percutaneous mitral commissurotomy enables predictive factors of late results to be identified. METHODS AND RESULTS: Late results of percutaneous mitral commissurotomy were assessed in 1024 consecutive patients. Good immediate results, defined as valve area ≥1.5 cm(2) without mitral regurgitation >2/4, were obtained in 912 patients (89%). These 912 patients were randomly split into 2 cohorts comprising 609 and 303 patients that were used to develop and validate, respectively, a scoring system predicting late functional results. The 20-year rate of good functional results (survival without cardiovascular death, mitral surgery, or repeat percutaneous mitral commissurotomy and in New York Heart Association class I or II) was 30.2 ± 2.0%. A multivariable Cox model identified 7 predictive factors of poor late functional results: higher final mean gradient (P<0.0001), interaction between age and final mitral valve area (P<0.0001) showing that the impact of valve area decreases with age, interaction between sex and valve calcification (P<0.0001) showing that the impact of valve anatomy is stronger in men, and interaction between rhythm and New York Heart Association class showing an impact of New York Heart Association class only in patients in atrial fibrillation (P<0.0001). A 13-point score enabled 3 risk groups to be defined, corresponding to predicted good functional results of 55.1%, 29.1%, and 10.5% at 20 years in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty years after percutaneous mitral commissurotomy in a population of patients with varied characteristics, 30% still had good functional results. Prediction of late functional results is multifactorial and strongly determined by age and the quality of immediate results. A simple validated scoring system is useful for estimating individual patient outcome.
BACKGROUND: Long-term follow-up after percutaneous mitral commissurotomy enables predictive factors of late results to be identified. METHODS AND RESULTS: Late results of percutaneous mitral commissurotomy were assessed in 1024 consecutive patients. Good immediate results, defined as valve area ≥1.5 cm(2) without mitral regurgitation >2/4, were obtained in 912 patients (89%). These 912 patients were randomly split into 2 cohorts comprising 609 and 303 patients that were used to develop and validate, respectively, a scoring system predicting late functional results. The 20-year rate of good functional results (survival without cardiovascular death, mitral surgery, or repeat percutaneous mitral commissurotomy and in New York Heart Association class I or II) was 30.2 ± 2.0%. A multivariable Cox model identified 7 predictive factors of poor late functional results: higher final mean gradient (P<0.0001), interaction between age and final mitral valve area (P<0.0001) showing that the impact of valve area decreases with age, interaction between sex and valve calcification (P<0.0001) showing that the impact of valve anatomy is stronger in men, and interaction between rhythm and New York Heart Association class showing an impact of New York Heart Association class only in patients in atrial fibrillation (P<0.0001). A 13-point score enabled 3 risk groups to be defined, corresponding to predicted good functional results of 55.1%, 29.1%, and 10.5% at 20 years in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty years after percutaneous mitral commissurotomy in a population of patients with varied characteristics, 30% still had good functional results. Prediction of late functional results is multifactorial and strongly determined by age and the quality of immediate results. A simple validated scoring system is useful for estimating individual patient outcome.
Authors: Gilson Soares Feitosa-Filho; José Maria Peixoto; José Elias Soares Pinheiro; Abrahão Afiune Neto; Afonso Luiz Tavares de Albuquerque; Álvaro César Cattani; Amit Nussbacher; Ana Amelia Camarano; Angela Hermínia Sichinels; Antonio Carlos Sobral Sousa; Aristóteles Comte de Alencar Filho; Claudia F Gravina; Dario Celestino Sobral Filho; Eduardo Pitthan; Elisa Franco de Assis Costa; Elizabeth da Rosa Duarte; Elizabete Viana de Freitas; Emilio Hideyuki Moriguchi; Evandro Tinoco Mesquita; Fábio Fernandes; Gilson Soares Feitosa; Humberto Pierre; Ilnei Pereira Filho; Izo Helber; Jairo Lins Borges; Jéssica Myrian de Amorim Garcia; José Antonio Gordillo de Souza; José Carlos da Costa Zanon; Josmar de Castro Alves; Kalil Lays Mohallem; Laura Mariana de Siqueira Mendonça Chaves; Lídia Ana Zytynski Moura; Márcia Cristina Amélia da Silva; Maria Alice de Vilhena Toledo; Maria Elisa Lucena Sales de Melo Assunção; Mauricio Wajngarten; Mauro José Oliveira Gonçalves; Neuza Helena Moreira Lopes; Nezilour Lobato Rodrigues; Paulo Roberto Pereira Toscano; Pedro Rousseff; Ricardo Antonio Rosado Maia; Roberto Alexandre Franken; Roberto Dischinger Miranda; Roberto Gamarski; Ronaldo Fernandes Rosa; Silvio Carlos de Moraes Santos; Siulmara Cristina Galera; Stela Maris da Silva Grespan; Teresa Cristina Rogerio da Silva; William Antonio de Magalhães Esteves Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Darae Kim; Hyemoon Chung; Jong Ho Nam; Dong Hyuk Park; Chi Young Shim; Jung Sun Kim; Hyuk Jae Chang; Geu Ru Hong; Jong Won Ha Journal: Yonsei Med J Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 2.759
Authors: Maciej Kubala; Christian de Chillou; Yohann Bohbot; Patrizio Lancellotti; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Christophe Tribouilloy Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-02-15
Authors: Benjamin S Wessler; Christine M Lundquist; Benjamin Koethe; Jinny G Park; Kristen Brown; Tatum Williamson; Muhammad Ajlan; Zuhair Natto; Jennifer S Lutz; Jessica K Paulus; David M Kent Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-10-04 Impact factor: 5.501